ok, so now I'm supposed to rip into fox's credibility, blah blah blah,.. this is fruitless and I'm tired of this kind of fun, tell me what kag means and then let's call it a day. edit: re kag, thanks buddy, on that we agree
The special council was appointed to dig into the charges that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians to impact the election......period. Mueller has kept a pretty tight lid on leaks, so in fact everyone is speculating. Mueller is using classic prosecutors’ tactics and appears to targeting secondary players on allied charges so he can leverage them. So far little seems to be directly tied to collusion until the notice that Gates has met with a Russian he new to be or have been an agent of the GRU. That seems to be the first possible direct link in the chain. I don’t know where this will lead. As I’ve said time and again I don’t want a Whitewater outcome where Trump is charged with a crime that has nothing to do with the central issue. It was wrong in the Clinton case, wrong when Lawrence Walsh did in Iran Contra and when Patrick Fitzgerald went after Scooter Libby when he couldn’t get W. It will be wrong here. As I said earlier NO ONE has a clue what Mueller has and what is at the end of the road. There’s no doubt he’s building some sort of case and he’s looking at Trump, his team and the Russians. You’re a fool to say Trump is going down and equally a fool to say there’s nothing there. We’ll see.
You sure are painting a lot of people with a full brush with no facts. You logic is about as silly as saying “prove god doesn’t exist” as evidence of existence. To the contrary, there is more actual evidence of political bias leading to the Russian narrative than there actually is of Russian collusion.
Did you understand what I said? Your response doesn’t indicate you even read it. The only things I said was that 1) Mueller was using classic prosecutors’ approach and tools. 2) That I hope it won’t go off on a wild goose chase like previous SP investigations did. 3) Most important I said none of us no shit about what Mueller has and both sides are speculating. What am I painting compared to your protestations of Trump’s innocence and @GiantDuckFan @LaSalleAve etc swearing he’s guilty? Try taking a reading comprehension course.
I never said he was guilty of anything other than being a piece of shit. Would it surprise he is in bed with the Russians? No.
a lot of stinky smoke for sure, but I doubt that I ever swore that he was absolutely guilty of conspiring with the russkies,.. how could I know for sure? Mostly I end up quibbling with those who swear up and down that the piece of shit is totally innocent of,.. well, everything.
"You’re a fool to say Trump is going down and equally a fool to say there’s nothing there. " But there isn't anything there. Again, there is more evidence this is political hackery than there is of collusion. And? . It already has. Of all the charges, zero to Russia Collusion. Again, there is more data to the other side being full of shit to collusion. Try communicating better.
All anyone has to see is who is on Mueller's team to understand this is a "get Trump by any means neccessary" investigation. The investigation should be into Hillary, Obama, the FBI and the previous DOJ. Whole thing is a sham Trump should fire Mueller and Jeff Sessions.
