Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by LSUpride123, Mar 3, 2017.
no, the key point is Sessions lied to the Senate investigating committee.
the White House spin, their propaganda broadcast by fox,.. then spilling forth from your mouth.
The ARTICLE YOU LINKED SAID HE REJECTED THE REQUEST...
Except thats not a lie though. Again, in the article YOU LINKED:
"I have not seen anything that would indicate collusion with Russians to impact the campaign." Clearly a subjective statement.
....."This new revelation is significant because Sessions told Congress under oath in June that he had "no knowledge" of any conversations by anyone connected to the Trump campaign about "any type of interference with any campaign" by Russians.
Congressional investigators want to question Sessions about the new disclosures,.... Both the judiciary and the intelligence committees have an interest in doing so".....
the Senate Investigating Committee, the House Investigating Committee, and the Judiciary Investigating Committee, sees it differently than you, 123,.. Robert Mueller does too I suspect.
3 indicted so far,.. more to come
Seems odd to me that there would be that much recollection about why he couldn't recall the conversation?
Its in plain english. An internet lawyer can win that case. You are just being riled up by Drms who cant do anything about MAGA.
Yea why would he intentionaly lie about shutting down a Russian meeting?
The Trump team was wiretapped. If there was more, we would know.
Sessions lied to Congress,.. 3 indicted so far,.. more to come.
good talk, we'll speak again when the next shoe drops
You mean we will talk when you pull another straw.
Zero indicted for Russia collusion BTW