So what. You act as though the sworn testimony of the FBI, CIA, NSA and the DNI isn't enough. As if it being only 3-4 intelligence agencies makes it somehow less true. This is as feeble as your previous argument that the meddling was somehow okay because it prevented us from having Clinton as President. If you think that this somehow makes your argument stronger you are sorely mistaken. If anything it makes you look more like the hack that I said you were.
Yo mama is so fat I ran out of gas trying to drive around her. Yo mama is so fat she could make love to two guys at the same time and they would never meet each other.
Trump dictated son’s misleading statement on meeting with Russian lawyer https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...eb7d3a2d304_story.html?utm_term=.827ddb1aba3c On the sidelines of the Group of 20 summit in Germany last month, President Trump’s advisers discussed how to respond to a new revelation that Trump’s oldest son had met with a Russian lawyer during the 2016 campaign — a disclosure the advisers knew carried political and potentially legal peril. The strategy, the advisers agreed, should be for Donald Trump Jr. to release a statement to get ahead of the story. They wanted to be truthful, so their account couldn’t be repudiated later if the full details emerged. But within hours, at the president’s direction, the plan changed. Flying home from Germany on July 8 aboard Air Force One, Trump personally dictated a statement in which Trump Jr. said that he and the Russian lawyer had “primarily discussed a program about the adoption of Russian children” The extent of the president’s personal intervention in his son’s response, the details of which have not previously been reported, adds to a series of actions that Trump has taken that some advisers fear could place him and some members of his inner circle in legal jeopardy. As special counsel Robert S. Mueller III looks into potential obstruction of justice as part of his broader investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election, these advisers worry that the president’s direct involvement leaves him needlessly vulnerable to allegations of a coverup. “This was . . . unnecessary,” said one of the president’s advisers, who like most other people interviewed for this article spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive internal deliberations. “Now someone can claim he’s the one who attempted to mislead. Somebody can argue the president is saying he doesn’t want you to say the whole truth.”
Trump personally dictating a false misleading press release,.. not exactly open and honest now is he?
