Sure, when your cranky old ass stops biting peoples' heads off....NOT. And btw, I was repeating something said that wasn't true, yet started a "movement." It was necessary to say it as such.
Well there's losing and there's losing. If we end up losing, by winning, it'll be like a one-run loss compared to a 10 run rule, that we would've had. It'll be like most SEC teams playing UL vs Bama. With the UL game we expect to win. With Bama, they know they're going to lose beforehand.
I'm not sure where you get that from any response I have posted. I'm simply waiting for you to supply me with evidence to support your claim of illegality. So, where is that law you keep talking about?
There is nothing I'm going to say that has not been said a 100 times already and you will still refuse to acknowledge it. So go ahead and live in your fantasy world.
Sum mo fo ya. (That's for CO too) https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/9b2f7523-b128-3db6-bd78-3e36cc2a72f4/suspicious-irregularities.html
All this hubba Ballou about Russian hackers. Let's see, did the Russians vote? Nope Did they hack the voting machines? Nope Did they intimidate the public? Nope Seems to me they shined a big ol Q beam on ol saggy tits and her shenanigans and yeah that cost her. So what? If she wasn't such a slimy piece of murdering shit she wouldn't have these problems
They just illuminated her cankle sores. Das Vedanya or whatever it is that Russians say when they drink a toast with vodka
The emphasis on hacking is the epitome of "fake news." If the emails that were "hacked" (and leaks attributed to "sources" in Intel agencies are far from compelling) would have containers only a simple character, such as the #, leaking every email, in its entirety, would have had zero impact. The only impact, if there was any, is ONLY attributable to the CONTENT. And the content is 100% the responsibility of the DNC and those of their ilk. But yet, the content is way under reported/emphasized in relation to the "hacking." And that, my friends is the fake news.
