http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/reince-priebus-rnc-hacked/story?id=44110357 The assertion that the RNC was hacked is by an anonymous government source as per the NYT, Washington Post, & probably the National Enquirer - the three amigos. I simply don't believe the NYT or WP. I'll need a reliable source. Such as, here's the Wall Street Journal 2 days ago: http://www.wsj.com/articles/republican-national-committee-security-foiled-russian-hackers-1481850043 Russian hackers tried to penetrate the computer networks of the Republican National Committee, using the same techniques that allowed them to infiltrate its Democratic counterpart, according to U.S. officials who have been briefed on the attempted intrusion. But the intruders failed to get past security defenses on the RNC’s computer networks, the officials said...
Where was your outage when Clinton put her personal desire for secrecy ahead of our country. We know that server was hacked by several interests, but leading up to the election none of you mouthing off now gave a shit.
lol at anyone quoting the great divider on anything to do with two sides working together. That dude hid more shit, lied, PUT out misinformation and acted on it.
Oh I don't really give a fuck who agrees or disagrees with that. EYE know DAM well, that's all I need. Hands up, don't shoot, I'll turn my back while my brothers loot.
If she were guilty of something I would be worried. The SOS isn't the Russians, regardless of how much you despise her. To turn your logic around, where is your outrage now? This has actually been proven so.....
I think the point is that HRC had been exposed to these problems for years and explicitly trained before assuming the SOS post. She affirmed and swore by signature that she had been trained in the use and protection of confidential information She then gnored these points and deliberately and carelessly put the nation at risk. Frankly NC, in light of what has just been revealed I don't understand why you're not outraged at her actions.