Politics Roe v Wade

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by kcal, May 3, 2022.

  1. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,079
    Likes Received:
    676
    I QUOTED THE BILL. The bill does not grant anybody a right to an abortion that they didn't already have under Roe v. Wade. What the bill does is codify Roe v. Wade while eliminating bullshit state restrictions that have been placed on already legal abortions. Does it go "beyond Roe v, Wade"? Yes, of course, but only in the sense that it SPECIFICALLY says what cannot be allowed by a state to hinder the Roe v. Wade constitutional right to abortion.

    Let's recall your original claim, shall we? That the Schumer bill would grant an unlimited right to abortion up into the very moment of birth, without restrictions. Not even your latest article claims that. Just admit that you were wrong.
     
    Last edited: May 14, 2022
  2. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,079
    Likes Received:
    676
    Save the fetus, starve the child.

    As I have stated several times now, these "pro-lifers" don't give a rat's ass about these children. It's all about SELF, about trying to score some morality points in the Overseer's book.
     
  3. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    31,200
    Likes Received:
    15,126
    Not even close. Chance vrs no chance.
     
  4. Kikicaca

    Kikicaca Meaux

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    13,902
    Likes Received:
    5,959
    2 things for you to do.
    1. Go watch a video of an actual late term abortion and watch the child twist and turn and scream as it is being torn apart.
    2. Go watch Band of Brothers and The Pacific to see what real men, patriotic men did to see that your sorry ass remains safe and your freedoms preserved so you can spew your vile opinions.

    If you do number 1 and you remain pro abortion you have no heart no soul
    If you do number 2 and remain a DEMOCRAT you are a marxist socialist and hate your country.
     
  5. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,079
    Likes Received:
    676
    You're a creepy freak who doesn't know what you're talking about. Roe v. Wade allowed criminalization of late term abortrions.
     
  6. Kikicaca

    Kikicaca Meaux

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    13,902
    Likes Received:
    5,959
    You have no moral or patriotic capital to call anyone a creep. Your president is a creepy demented un patriotic pedophile whom you adore which makes you a creep for adoring someone like that. As far as Roe vs Wade you are using that as a smoke screen. You know we all know the DEMOCRAT PARTY which you are a member of want abortion on demand and even after the child is born. Me creepy? Nothing more creepy and freakish than someone agreeing that dismembering a child in a mother's womb is OK.

    Now go watch what real patriotic men do you creep.
     
    Last edited: May 14, 2022
  7. Jmg

    Jmg Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    7,123
    Likes Received:
    4,481
    so to be clear, the schumer biill restricts abortion? in what way?

    i think you are confused and the bill does in fact allow abortion until the moment of birth. its the local states that can prevent that. schumer and the democrats generally want no restrictions on the rights of the women to her own body.

    for the record you oppose late term abortion and you favor ignoring the woman;s right to her own body, correct?
     
    Winston1 likes this.
  8. Jmg

    Jmg Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    7,123
    Likes Received:
    4,481
    when why do you support wade if it allowed interfering with the woman;s right to her own body? her body her choice, not white men like you
     
  9. Kikicaca

    Kikicaca Meaux

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    13,902
    Likes Received:
    5,959
    I keep hearing about a women's right to an abortion. She in my mind does NOT have the total right to killing or not killing a child without the consent of the man who got her pregnant. No child without a man even if it's artificial insemination. It's still murder but to omit the man is to give women God like power. Also if the man doesn't want the child he should be held responsible. The woman should also be held responsible because she chose to have sex. The child should be given up for adoption if not wanted. In the case of rape the man should be put away and also held monetarily responsible. The child should be put up for adoption if not wanted.
     
  10. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,079
    Likes Received:
    676
    You have a reading comprehension problem. A severe one.
     

Share This Page