Kyle honestly showed a lot of restraint. All those people and he only hit direct threats to his life. He had many more rounds he could have dispersed if he so decided.
Defense rests. Lines are drawn. Rex will get his riot because the left only wants one outcome or there will be an appeal after the prosecutor deliberately tried to sabotage the case.
Yeah kinda like if you push a burning dumpster into a car full of people or say violently stomp someone in the head while they are on the ground or point a gun at someone's head and say I am going to kill you. All this was done to someone who was running away trying to turn himself into to cops by the people I mentioned in the last sentence. All the guys who did this to Rittenhouse were there too and past curfew at a place where violence was happening THAT THEY WERE PERPERTRATING. Why were those good upstanding citizens there? So why did this mob chase Rittenhouse and when catching him proceed stomping him hitting him over the head with a skateboard and threatening to kill him. Why if they were such great citizens didn't they go to the police? The police were everywhere. No they were engaged in vigilantism weren't they. They decided to be judge jury and executioner didn't they. Lastly you are a typical leftist lyar. Rittenhouse DIDN'T shoot the child rapist who attempted to MURDER people by burning them to death when his hands were up he shot the child rapist who attempted to MURDER people by burning them to death when he pointed a gun at his head and said I will kill you. You have lied about this whole incident since this thread began.
i think we both know he murdered him for threatening to kill him, and then chasing him. is it your contention that when the child rapist said he would kill him, and chased him, that rittenhouse should lie down on the ground, politely hand the child rapist his gun and thank him for his numerous rapes of boys and also please murder him gently? how do you think KR should have handled this multiple young boy rapist?
correct, which is why, as was explicitly testified to by the victim in court, KR shot him after he advanced on him whilst aiming his gun at him. presumably you think the proper move is to thank this yet another criminal for his efforts and allow him to shoot KR in the face? do you think any scenario exists when self defense is justified? you seem to oppose self defense from attacking boy rapists, skateboard brain smashers, and even loons pointing guns directly at you. do you think, for example, when attacked, your family should just hand over all belongings, give up your wife and kids for raping, then allow all criminals to plunge blades into your aorta and rape your corpse, using your blood as lube? i mean, is there any time, ever, when self defense can be justified, according to you?
i see, so your contention is that because rittenhouse came to a violent place with a weapon, all attacks on him are justified. the child rapist could rape him (rittenhouse was 17 at the time, and the child rapist probably thinks thats too old to rape) and there is no defense? should every armed person there who are ostensibly there to defend private property be killed, thats all justified? is all defense of property vs thugs an act of violence? if my wife calls, says there is a riot at my house, and then, i, as you say: "arrive armed (illegally at that, and in violation of curfew) to a place where violence is happening, prepared for violence, and you engage in violence", thats not ok? the cops arrived armed, knowing there would be violence, should they be anally raped and murdered too?
this KR story is hugely illustrative of how the left collectively is an empty vessel, just parroting the narratives they are meant to follow. i mean, nothng could be clearer than KR is justified. he will walk, we all know that. and yet the left, and the media etc, they are cheering for the life imprisonment of an innocent person. its immoral of them. the broader and more dangerous context is that they also cheer the genocidal chinese communist party. they need to start being reasonable.
you're right...everyone knows that KR will walk. The leftgacy media is essentially dousing everything with gasoline, pushing hard that KR is a murderer, racist (no idea?), etc...so that when he does walk the place will go up in flames and buildings will burn, property destroyed, and saddest of all, people will die. But they will have sensational ratings for a couple of weeks - make lots of money.
the media calls rittenhouse a white supremacist, which they invented out of thin air. i am reading an aweseomf book now by john mchworter, woke racism, the anti-racist religion of the left. it goes in depth about how the aim is always to prove personal piety by being the first to accuse people of racism, which is something i have been trying to expln and express for years. the two modern liberal driving ideologies are telling everyone they are racist, and having trump derangement syndrome, which is of course intertwined with their tendency to call anything and everything racist. its their driving impulse. everything is white supremacist. literally if a black person attacks an asian, its trumps white supremacism behind it
Your defense of Rittenhouse is rightwing b.s. of course, that any vigilantism against protestors for black victims is justifiable homicide, but this Chinese Party stuff... you just made that up. Are you mental? And you say the anti-fascist, anti-white supremacist left has to start being reasonable?
