When I finally understood that paragraph, I loled a little bit. It was a nice attempt to rationalize your coaches indiscretions, looking at a coaches track record like a stat line. Kinda like, "everyone dies, so they must have lived the same life." You bet your ass there's a difference between how Miles and Saban handle themselves when being asked a direct question, bama boy. One blatantly lies, the other is careful in choosing his words. Apples to apples.
My argument is guilt by association, not innocence. HERE'S AN INTERESTING THOUGHT: Perhaps in both cases the public simply doesn't have the right to know, in the first place. Maybe that's why you're taking this double talk so well.
Can you see the inherent advantage that coach Miles wields? Louisianan speak: A lie is a lie is a lie, unless you really have no "right" to know.
Now you're on to something. You're correct that the public doesn't really have a right to know. I'll take it a step further and say that, if one deems it necessary in a case like this, they have the right to tell an outright lie, instead of appearing to leave a door open. Saban chose to outright lie, which gives people the right to consider him a dick.
Why would he take a pay cut to go to Michigan - they will offer $2.4 million a year according to Big Blue Sports guy.
It's being reported that they offered Harbaugh around $5.25 million. Getting your ass whipped by tOSU tends to loosen the pursestrings. EVO/Tapatalk
Sounds like we have a major break through in your Crimson point of view. Welcome to the club. The media have made these direct questions completely unfair to these coaches. We wouldn't do the same in our own secular lives and that's all these guys are deciding for themselves. Who in their right mind would put their present job in jeopardy before securing their future one. Otherwise you might be explaining to your wife, kids and mortgage holder how you are presently without either. How does the public's right to know supersede that logic?
