Republicans just officially declared that women have no dominion over their own bodies

Interesting. This is kind of one of those things where a movement loops back on itself through time. In the 60's there was this liberation from a sort of old fashioned view on sexual intercourse that was formed by religious doctrine and Victorian era chastity. The sexual liberation movement broke down this no sex until marriage custom and women were enjoying the freedom of fucking. That was followed by Roe vs. Wade because all these women getting pregnant outside of marriage and ruining there sexual liberation sex. Roe vs. Wade gets overturned and now all these new women are going back to a no sex stance.

No sex = no abortion followed by no abortion = no sex. Therefore, no sex = no sex.

Indeed Nietzsche, time is a flat circle.

 

its ok i will accept blowjobs until the women get over it

 

Guess the homeless dudes don’t get laid anymore, maybe some nerds and other basement dwellers as well.
Then again when an itchy ear is scratched who is the most grateful? The finger?

 

I was raised Catholic and have always believed that abortion was not right. I have trouble in certain instances of rape and incest and my beliefs are my own.

I dont like forcing my opinion on others but i have never agreed that it is a womens right only and a man who was involved had no say so.

It is a very tough subject for both sides.

 

I have always believed that religious nutjobs don't actually care about saving babies.... they're just trying to win brownie points into heaven. I see this cause because once that baby is born those same wingnuts have very little interest in voting for daycare, infant healthcare, pre-K, anti-poverty programs, or even sensible measures that would keep children safe from mass-slaughters in schools.

 

you do realize these services are available without the govt? for example instead of paying taxes and then the govt buying your daycare, you could just use that same money and buy daycare. but of course with biden giving away money and destroying the labor market, and inflation out of control it will be expensive.

i oppose the govt buying your meals and house. that doesnt mean i oppose people having these things.

i know you want to print money and give away "free" everything, but its actually more efficient to just pay market rates for these things. dont expect taxpayers to buy everything you have.


"anti-poverty programs"

low inflation is a very good anti-poverty program.

you are doing this "i know X is a hypocrite because they do X but not Y in some other situation" again. its always stupid when you do this. reading their minds and telling them they dont actually care about babies is absurd.

 

futhermore, i think its instructive to notice how for democrats its always about the politics of personal hypocrisy, never the issue itself. hypocrisy and racism. thats all. never an analysis of the issue at and. politics exist not as a way to think about improvement, but as a way to tell a nigga theys a punk ass hypocrite racist. well this nigga aint having it.

i care about some issues, like for example drug legalization. i dont do drugs or want to do them legally. but the drug war is a humanitarian and financial disaster. but people oppose me on this. i know why, its because they think drugs ruin lives and they want to keep them away from people. i disagree on how best to keep people from abusing drugs. but i dont go around bringing it up just to say that those opposing me are fucking hypocrite racists. i dont say to them: " well you favor this but not that HAHAH LOL HYPOCrITZ". its not about painting you opponent as an asshole hypocrite. who gives a shit about that? its about the issue itself. its not abou tfiding personal flaws in your opponents. its about the flaws in this thinking. in this case, the point is that drug legalization doesn't increase drug abuse. not that the person for the drug war is a racist wants to jail BIPOCs

stick to the issues, democrats. talk about why we should be energy independent, or why we should buy OPEC oil, or why we need a ministry of truth, or why its ok to murder babies. i can tell you why i think its ok to murder them,. but the left, knowing politics is purely about calling the other guy an asshole, wont admit that, it makes them look bad. and thats all the matters.

its worth noting that when i ask and try to get clarification on policy, its ignored and avoided. seems people on the left arent so much interested in the issue. unless the issue is calling somebody a white supremacist, then they cant talk fast enough.

 

I'm probably more liberal than most of my compadres here on this subject. Rape, incest, and when a mother's life is in danger beyond the normal risk of pregnancy are a given. As far as choice abortions, I will continue to support early abortions (<12 weeks) until everyone pulls their collective heads out of their arses and demands BIRTH CONTROL. For high-risk populations, especially ones on welfare, mandatory, compliance free (IUD, injections, implants) should be implemented. I would gladly pay tax money to prevent pregnancy, and thus eliminate abortion all together (excepting the above rape, incest, etc). To me, it is rather sanctimonious to demand no abortions but then not provide the means to prevent unwanted pregnancy. Let's face it, those liberal bitches promising to stop having sex will be the first to get pregnant.

OTOH .. I'm totally in support of the SCOTUS ruling simply because that was the correct ruling, and the STATE is where the issue belongs. In particular, the issue, and all its' nuances, like rape, incest, medical need, parental notification, etc, NEEDS to be brought up on a ballot initiative to be voted on by the PEOPLE of each State. I do not trust Politicians to handle such an issue because either party only represents the extremes of the issue. Take your pick, no restrictions on abortion, or life begins at conception. Politicians have to pander to the small percentage of people who hold these extreme positions because they determine the primaries. That's not a recipe for success.

 

Which accounts for a tiny percentage of abortions

 

Regardless of one's stance on abortion - it's hard to see how filling our already overcrowded prisons with women and doctors is good for America.