That's a bit of putting the cart before the horse. If there were no child around to ponder I wouldn't ponder about the child at all.
WTF? Personhood is the very issue upon which the opinion of most people who support abortion rights rests.
yes, person-hood is their stance,.. a rationale to turn a blind eye away from the fetus's right to live,.. it's how "abortion rights" justify murder.
No, viability was the language used to classify person-hood. You are wrong. Person-hood, in terms of the constitution, was a classification. Nothing to do with science. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11753511 "Viability exists as a function of biomedical and technological capacities, which are different in different parts of the world. As a consequence, there is, at the present time, no worldwide, uniform gestational age that defines viability. Viability is not an intrinsic property of the fetus because viability should be understood in terms of both biological and technological factors."
Good lord. Your inability to identify and differentiate discussion contexts is truly staggering. I'll say it again: nobody here was talking about legalities, court rulings, or legal definitions. GOT IT? We were talking about PERSONAL views on abortion. GOT IT? Personhood is the issue upon which the support of most pro-choice advocates rests; despite the smears of people such as yourself hardly anybody wants to kill actual children. GOT IT?
