I never watch that shit, especially this year, but a guy I know has gone berserk over the MAJOR networks dissin' the Convention and not broadcasting the "good stuff." I don't know. But, if the Dems really do have the GENTLE GIANT'S mom speak, that should/be catastrophic. Maybe the GOP can get Al Capone's great grandson! Damn, I wish I could emigrate!!!
Well, no. Whomever wrote the speech (clearly not her no matter what Trumpster says), clipped approximately 5% of her total speech. You are doing what the media does. They gloss a story for maximum impact no matter what the actual truth is. Now, do you really think that people would view this story the same once they realize that a very small passage in a much longer and unique speech was plagiarized? Particularly when the part in question uses some very ambiguous and often-used terms in just about any political speech? I don't think Melania is a fraud. I think English is her second language. She's a wife, not a political operative, and in a time when even Obama screws up and has to use a teleprompter, her use of speech writers and making this mistake, is not newsworthy. Let me do some plagiarizing now......what, at this point, does it matter?
Who were the two parties YOU were referring to when you said both of them? Cause to me they would be Trump and Melania and then of course, I don't understand how LaSalle would get turned on by Trump. Goes without saying....or so I thought.
The two people LaSalle and gumbo were commenting on about Melania lifting someone's speech...her and Michelle. Go back and see who LaSalle quoted when he said what I quoted.
