Reopening Clinton Email Investigation

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by LSUTiga, May 13, 2017.

  1. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,743
    Likes Received:
    23,921
    Absolutely false. If you had any idea of what you are talking about you would realize that "intent" is completely irrelevant when mishandling of sensitive information is concerned. That shit was completely made up by the powers that wanted to keep her ass out of jail where it belongs.
     
  2. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    766
    Speaking of SCIF, Mike Pence and other fellows of the Trump transition team moved SCI data between various buildings before inauguration WITHOUT PERMISSION. Should he be imprisoned?
     
  3. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    766
    Once again you don't know what you're talking about. The word "willfully" is all over the statutes. Do you need to consult a dictionary for the definition of "willful"?
     
  4. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,743
    Likes Received:
    23,921
    No because I know the rules. I know the rules because I've handled plenty of classified data and nowhere did it say " it's okay if you fuck this up as long as you didn't mean it" you are in over your head home boy
     
    LSUTiga, Bengal B and el005639 like this.
  5. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,700
    Likes Received:
    16,641
    Who's permission do they need? What was their intent?
     
    shane0911 likes this.
  6. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,743
    Likes Received:
    23,921
    They don't like it when you do that
     
  7. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,700
    Likes Received:
    16,641
    You know I have been doing this for about 6 months now and seems they just can't connect the dots.
     
    shane0911 likes this.
  8. Rex

    Rex Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    7,725
    Likes Received:
    766
    It's clear you don't know jack shit. How many examples of the actual laws in question do you need? Start with these, you liar:

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 – Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    (a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record.....

    18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
    (a) Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States,
     
  9. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,743
    Likes Received:
    23,921
    Now you've proven you know nothing about sensitive information nor law. Carry on Mr. Magoo
     
    LSUpride123 likes this.
  10. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,700
    Likes Received:
    16,641
    She took classified training on how to handle classified information. She even signed that she took the training.

    Taking the training, you would know the physical layers one would have to break in order for this information to be sent on a non-secure system.

    Being that you have to have a clearance AND a need to access the information, it was willful. There is no other way around it.


    SO no, you dont know what the fuck you are talking about.

    In other words, the physical remove is "intentional".
     
    shane0911 and Bengal B like this.

Share This Page