Religious Freedom Restoration Act - Indiana

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by mancha, Mar 30, 2015.

  1. gyver

    gyver Rely on yourself not on others.

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,001
    Likes Received:
    717
  2. mctiger

    mctiger RIP, and thanks for the music Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2003
    Messages:
    26,751
    Likes Received:
    17,050
    Bingo. Society ain't perfect and it needs regulating and policing on many levels, but free enterprise at this fundamental level will police itself. And if the extreme left would quit pushing for laws that make some people do what they don't want to do, the extreme right wouldn't feel obliged to respond with idiocy like RFRA.
     
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2015
    uscvball and gyver like this.
  3. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    My point is that there are just not a lot of these cases. Her test case isn't going so well for her, is it? She can't make a case that photographing a wedding ceremony significantly impacts her freedom of religion. Her free speech argument is equally poor. She can't make a case that photographing someone else's wedding constitutes being forced to "celebrate" and approve of the betrothed. She is either in a public business or not. If she's in public business, she cannot discriminate based on this.

    Personally, I think this crap doesn't need another law to address. People have reasons to do business or not do business with vendors and contractors all of the time. Many times they cannot agree on the arrangements and must each go their own way. If a business doesn't want to make some grand public statement about their religious politics, they can find some other reason (price, logistics, calendar, guarantees, vacation) where they cannot come to terms on a contract. Recommend another contractor. Be nice. Don't overtly discriminate and there is room for an amiable arrangement.

    Likewise, I think if a customer suspects that a business holds him in contempt, he should just take his business elsewhere and vote with his wallet. I don't think they have reason to sue unless the business somehow overtly cheats them, holds them up to ridicule, or acts fraudulently in some fashion.

    Lots of gray area here, but that is what we pay judges to sort out, case by case. We can't make a law that pleases everybody or covers all circumstances.
     
    uscvball likes this.
  4. gyver

    gyver Rely on yourself not on others.

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Messages:
    2,001
    Likes Received:
    717
  5. uscvball

    uscvball Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2006
    Messages:
    10,673
    Likes Received:
    7,156
    Fear not peeps....Pat Haden is refusing to attend the NCAA Championship Committee meeting in Indiana because....he has a gay son. Things should be crystal clear now.

    Pat is willing to take it up the ass from the NCAA regarding his Trojan family but will stand up to the NCAA so that his son can....well....you know.
     
    Bengal B likes this.
  6. Bengal B

    Bengal B Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    47,986
    Likes Received:
    22,994
    He doesn't want to go against the agenda of the Fabulous Athletes Group.
     
  7. uscvball

    uscvball Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2006
    Messages:
    10,673
    Likes Received:
    7,156
    Let me guess....Michael Sam is a founding member.
     
    Bengal B likes this.
  8. uscvball

    uscvball Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2006
    Messages:
    10,673
    Likes Received:
    7,156
    Could not agree more. Once upon a time on this forum, my mind changed regarding the concept of enforcing no-smoking restaurants, etc. I became convinced that restaurant owners should make the choice and then let the free market choose which establishment to support. The constant wrangling of rights via lawsuits and legislature is a waste of time and money.
     
  9. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    Ahhhh I see what you did there :)
     
  10. gumborue

    gumborue Throwin Ched

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2003
    Messages:
    10,839
    Likes Received:
    577
    That's eeoc which only relates to employment. Sex orientation is not a protected class.
    since blacks in the South were beaten for sitting at a private diner's counter.

    What if your "religion" said blacks were inferior because Moses cursed Ham?
     

Share This Page