Not really. it means he reads the bills. The bills could have different exemptions. Some might be absurd. Some might be legit. Why on earth would you want a all or nothing type guy? That's what the extreme left/right is.
You make assumptions without evidence. I don't want Rand Paul at all. I'm commenting on his poor response to a question in the video, despite your best efforts to argue everything else under the sun. Let it go.
rand is not ready for the big time. maybe in 4 or 8. but i like his old answer on abortion. seems like the woman and the Dr get to decide.
You are talking out your ass. What exactly did I deflect? Look, you are not interested in debating the issue, you just want to be contrary. Bye, now.
No. I proved that Paul is ok with exemptions and that he stated each situation is unique. It's not a yea or no answer like these "got ya" reporters ask. I then asked you if you would rather a guy be all or nothing or compromise. You deflected. So answer or stop your bitching. It's getting old.
I'm done with you. You can't debate a topic. You can't make a logical deduction. All you do is try to pull my chain. Adios.
And there isn't media bias according to our left leaning friends...I wonder how many "gotcha" questions got asked by the loyal Dems... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/10/hillary-clinton-journalists-2016_n_7039814.html
