Shot placement. Even the weight of the bullet had to be accounted for. It’s also not about blowing a deer to pieces when hunting. Weight and grain really only matter when thinking about distance shots. Come to think of it, that 45-70 would most likely disintegrate somebody
Wrong. There have been and are laws that limit the scope of legal arms. The simplest is the requirement for steel shot or complete ban on fully automatic weapons (except with special license). As Earl Long told a Louisiana state senator who advocated resistance to integration…”Whatcha gonna due Willy? The feds have the abomb?
We must pass a bill to limit the size and amount of the rocks Americans can possess. Add a 5 day waiting period to the bill. Oh and the rock pouch can only hold 3 rocks. Who needs more than 3 rocks to kill a deer after all. Oh my just think of the lives we could save!
SO you think 100% of the government will bomb itself? Seems like a win win to me.... Damn you are retarded.
Wrong again, no one is surprised. Because laws were passed does not mean they were reasonable. The Steele shot law was for the ducks and other wildlife and nothing to do with gun control. So I've taken apart your stupid "great damage" thesis on ammo and now you're left with nothing. Time to wrap it up.
Actually all you’ve done is proven you’re a close minded simpleton who would argue with a rock. You haven’t done anything to change physics or my argument. You make the same mistake that those who want to outlaw semi-automatics. You ignore the real differences to lie about your point. I left this forum awhile back because arguing with idiots only makes you one as well. You @shane0911 begged me to come back. Well begging won’t help this time. I’m restricting myself to the Tiger sports forum.
This was your initial argument. Once we dismantled it, now you are crying and leaving. Good riddance. You should take some time away from politics. Your brain needs to heal.
