Forums Register login What's New?
Proof refs cheat for Bama!
Page 2 of 7
  1. Be careful there are some lurking gumps on here who even if they see proof they don't see the bias (ie INT several years back by PP)

    What am I talking about that's most gumps
  2. Although the first LF "fumble" I seriously question. Looked like his knee and ankle were on the ground before the ball came out, then you have the technicality on the second fumble.
    TheRealist and didit like this.
  3. It's all.
    Rouxleaux likes this.
  4. I'm picking up a wee touch of cynicism. Mostly I don't allow crap calls to fester like an inflamed boil.Otherwise, I wouldn't have to go back more than 6 days ago.
  5. Easy attitude to take when the vast majority of the crap calls go in your favor.
  6. Yes, winning helps you get over things. No, I don't think the majority of calls go in our favor. Winning creates the illusion.
  7. Nah, the illusion is the way you gumps ignore the proof when its put before you in case after case after case after.....And no one denies the excellence you guys consistently put on the field. All the more reason that favoritism is totally unnecessary, yet you do get it.
    StaceyO and fanatic like this.
  8. I was mostly referring to the delahoussaye reenactment of the Nash/Hogan WCW Fingerpoke of doom.
    furduknfish likes this.
  9. Should probably get it in before the kent st. game
  10. FIFY
    TheRealist and BAY0U BENGAL like this.
(You have insufficient privileges to reply here.)
Page 2 of 7