The funding of them doesn't or do you see that as necessary spending? And its an honest question, Im not being an azz.
correct, i see it is completely necessary expense. paying for wars and defense is one of the few things a government should do. and both these wars are very necessary.
If you had listened to them you would have heard it. I saw Glenn Beck here in OKC a few weeks ago and he was not kind to bush at all. He even spoke out against the patriot act because it violates a time honored American principal. The bottom line is it really doesn't matter who is doing it or "its okay because he/she did it first". It is wrong, wrong for the people, wrong for the democracy and wrong for the country. Getting angry because some people are waking up and getting wise to what is happening is IMO a "Fail".
Beck at times says things i agree with, i just think he way too dramatic. I'm surprised he doesn't live in a bomb shelter.
Lol thats complete bullshyt. People are waking up because Obama has a D behind his name instead of an R, most of the policies are all the same, they're just against it now because it isnt their party and when it is their party they dont say shyt because they are too busy getting rich.
He can "overstate" a point at times, but if you listen and get down to the base then it is there and it is more times than not right on the money. He hates andy stern and for good reason. I guess that fact that he is in the WH so much really means nothing. No agenda there, he doesn't make policy does he? Nahh nothing there, just look the other way.
My man, slow down. They are angry because they are the same policies yet in hyperdrive. No country, no civilization, no group of people, monkeys, ants, or any other living thing has ever in history spent their way to prosperity. That is why they are angry.
