President Reagan on Socialized healthcare

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by JSracing, Aug 28, 2009.

  1. MLUTiger

    MLUTiger Secular Humanist

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2001
    Messages:
    4,606
    Likes Received:
    810
    Sweet. pwned by your name-calling. That'll show me.
     
  2. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    i asked you not to be a tool, i didnt call you anything, pay attention. and for the record, adults shouldnt use the word "pwned".
     
  3. MLUTiger

    MLUTiger Secular Humanist

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2001
    Messages:
    4,606
    Likes Received:
    810
    I shifted into interwebs teenager mode when you said I was acting like a tool. It was a Pavlovian response...
     
  4. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    next time dont bore either of us by claiming i was apologizing when i wasnt. just address what i said directly, like an adult. we wont have to endure any useless back and forth like this.

    my claim was that we do in fact know what socialism is, and that government administration of health care is a move towards socialism. that is what almost all of us have been saying all along. your accusation that we simply do not know what socialism is is incorrect.

    who here exactly do you think doesnt know what socialism is, and why?

    and how is the obama plan not "socialized" medicine?

    if liberals want liberalism work they need to not be so scared of the labels that describe them. socialist policies simply means policies that involve government ownership and management of things. like i mentioned before, social security is clearly a socialistic policy, that is why it is called that. it is also terribly bad and expensive policy.

    you dont hear conservatives accusing anyone of slandering them by calling them capitalists, do you? even though 99% of them dont really favor pure unfettered capitalism. liberals should stop being worried so much about labels and b proud they are are in favor of more socialism. i am in favor of way more capitalism, but you wont see me deny it.

    or perhaps the label "socialist" has a such an overwhelmingly negative connotation because it is terrible for the government to manage most things?
     
  5. Frogleg

    Frogleg Registered Best

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Messages:
    3,268
    Likes Received:
    1,973
    I think LaSalleAve & MLU should have all legal rights of married folks, except the name of 'marriage'. Traditions and culture are a pillar of civilized society. Sorry boys.
     
  6. MLUTiger

    MLUTiger Secular Humanist

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2001
    Messages:
    4,606
    Likes Received:
    810
    For the record, Ronald Reagan wasn't that bad of a President. He wasn't the best of my lifetime, but he was far from the worst. We could do (and have done) worse as a country. I don't get why he gets such a pass for the Iran/Contra mess, but every President has their skeletons.

    Traditions and culture, huh? I think that was the basis for the opposition of women's right to vote and black people using the same water fountain as the white people. I think some refer to it as the "good old days".

    You're one step below outright name-calling and one step just about "yo mamma" jokes, which is where people find themselves when they're incapable of expressing themselves intellectually.

    Now you're being disingenuous.

    Socialism gets tossed around carelessly and is used as a buzzword in an attempt to connect it with a perceived negative. Republicans like to use the word "liberal" while Democrats prefer the word "progressive". Pro-life v. Pro-choice. Etc, etc, etc... Keep parroting whatever talking points you hear from your preferred talking head, biased blog, etc. I prefer to remain unencumbered by such partisan idiocy that only serves as a catalyst for intellectual entropy.

    It's pure political fear-mongering and it's intellectually dishonest. You choose to use it and I'll treat you accordingly. You have some nerve to call me a tool...
     
  7. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    some people happen to think more government is a negative thing. so of course the word has negative connotations today. is your argument gonna have anything to do with actual policy, or are you just going to babble?

    how is a larger, more involved, more expensive, more intrusive health care plan not sliding the country slightly away from capitalism towards socialism?

    congrats.

    well, technically i asked you not to act like a tool, and didnt call you anything. take the chip off your shoulder and talk policy.

    as far as the fear-mongering goes, it goes both ways. obama says we are gonna be screwed if we do nothing. obama says we have to spend a trillion for toxic assets to save the economy. obama says we need to bail out these massive companies because they are too big to fail. lets forget the partisan bickering and talk about whether these folks are right or wrong. obama says we need a massive carbon tax or the earth will be ruined.

    and for the record i dont watch or listen to any talking heads or read any biased blogs, except for the huffington post, which i dont agree with at all. i read all of my news in online newpapers or on bbc america. i simply have principles, one of which is that i think people should be free to pursue their lives with the absolute minimum invasion from the government.

    look, the fact is that the republicans (very few of which i really identify with politically) are effectively calling out this health care plan by calling it socialist. it is a smart tactic, and i hope they continue.

    there are things the governemtn should manage (war, infrastructure, basic education), and health unsurance isnt one of them. if thomas jefferson were here right now he would hi five me for saying that.
     
  8. LaSalleAve

    LaSalleAve when in doubt, mumble

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    44,037
    Likes Received:
    18,027
    Eh sabanfan, i never had any credibility anyway, so who cares. I think reagan did alot stop the progression of minorities in this country. Why is it, that when reagan became president, the punishment for crack cocaine was 4 times harsher than the punishment for powder cocaine? The only difference in the 2 are baking soda. Plus its well documented that the Reagan administration sold weapons to Iran, to fund the Contras, the CIA under Reagan also allowed the import of cocaine into the united states, which also funded the contras. Reagan was pretty damned crooked, and i don't think he should be put on a pedestal. He was a crappy actor too.
     
  9. PURPLE TIGER

    PURPLE TIGER HOPE is not a strategy!

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2006
    Messages:
    7,186
    Likes Received:
    395
    Had he legalized marijuana...he would be your all-time favorite. :hihi:
     
  10. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    I'm not sure that capitalism and socialism are the extremes here. This isn't about theoretical political systems, it's about a government health care plan. It's either socialized medicine or it isn't. The plan involves free enterprise in a big way, so it isn't, IMO.

    Perhaps the term socialistic is getting in the way.

    so⋅cial⋅is⋅tic  –adjective
    1. of or pertaining to socialists or socialism.
    2. in accordance with socialism.
    3. advocating or supporting socialism.

    Socialistic is an adjective. By those definition, to call it socialistic heath care is to call it socialism. The bill will have too many freedoms of the user to choose private options to call it socialism.

    If you are trying to say it is more liberal than the failing existing system, then yes, obviously. But the right tends to paint anything left of their position as creeping socialism and have done so for 90 years. This idea seems to be just more of the same and is starting to sound like McCarthyism.
     

Share This Page