People will need to consider turning vegetarian if the world is to conquer climate change

So:

What are the answers to these? That's all I want to know. None of the gobbledygook tells me that. If the mean sea level temp rises .03 degrees over a millenium tells me nothing. What's happened since the Big Bang is irrelevant to me. What do the geeks say is going to happen? Should I build an ark?

 

how do you know gore is overstating the problem? he has plenty of evidence, from the same sources you use. he uses the same ipcc graphs you use. how am i to know that obama is not overstating the problem, like gore, when he says the carbon tax is necessary.

again, i think people who buy the global warming scam are just not paying attention to human nature. if global warming hysteria did not exist, there would be a similar scare to replace it. we white folks in the first world have plenty of time on our hands and we need a religion, preferably one that involves humanity being sinful enough so that we can have a reason to seek redemption.

and again, scientists really dont get grants or seats on panels or headlines with conclusions like "climate uncertain, unpredictable, might get warmer or cooler, data inconclusive".

questions without clear answers have always frustrated humans, and they never hesitate to find answers where there are none.

 

There already is, pick one of about 10 crisis that is going on today.
Obama and the Libs, Ron Emanuel have never let a good crisis go to waste.
The more crisis the more willing people are going to be to give up freedom which in return gives the government and people in power more money and more power.
Al Gore and Obama for starters.
Look at the money these people make and it trickles right down to the scientists that put out this garbage.
It is garbage, no way anything you breathe or exhale is poison.
Look how ridiculus things have become, we are talking about animals and cow patties that are a danger to the environment.
Don't you dare breathe or fart.
Some who believe this are now talking about how bad people are for the planet, population control?

Who in the hell is going to get rich off of the carbon tax?
Some of the same Obama has criticized for stealing from the rightful owners.
Who the hell are the rightful owners? I think Obama stole from them as well, he's rich!
Who is going to suffer from this crap?
Poor people.

Meanwhile Obama has his colby beef and travels around the world, joy ride in NYC.
He and Michele travel in different planes, overseas for olympic bid.

If Al Gore, Obama and the Libs believed the sh!t they preached they would live quite differently.
If you don't practice what you preach then shut the hell up!
There is no one who has a bigger carbon footprint then the ass holes who preach and support this bs.

 

well, is he or isnt he? gore says the future of civilizaion is at risk, and he has the science to back him up, and a nobel prize. is his science wrong? i bet he has plenty of peer reviewed evidence.

do you ever take a position on anything, or do you merely reference others? is al gore correct, or isnt he? is his science flawed or not? does he not have mountains of peer reviewed evidence for his claims? yes or no?

unlike you, i have a position. i think he is skewing the evidence, which is itself skewed and politically slanted and presumes to understand and predict what is basically unpredictable.

what do you think? no opinion? a link to some study? no opinion on anything except that you think cap and trade is a good idea (which took pages and pages of asking for you to take a stand on), for no reason you are willing to defend?

 

his science indicates that the future of civilization is at risk. do you agree that this is what the science indicates? this is independent of his solutions or ideas about how to fix things.

again, i am not in a position where i need to prove anything, you are. you are the one in favor of change. you are the one that favors a carbon tax which will necessarily punish the people that can least afford it. i favor freedom. freedom doesnt need to be justified. the burden to explain why is on the guy who wants to force his will on everyone else. thats you.

of course you have. you are in favor of and oppose everything except moderateness, which you will not define except for to say you oppose the things you arbitrarily label as extreme.

what am i to prove? that predictions are fallible? that making projections based on models of complex interacting phenomena is necessarily a risky business? want me to prove that humankind likes to seek redemption for non-crimes? open the bible. it is right there in the beginning.

would you like me to prove that government regulations of things have unintended consequences? have you ever opened an economics textbook?

 

How 'bout the hirsute mollusk?