Border skirmishes or military operations designed to invade a country? What non-nuclear state would do that? Nonsense? Are you telling me you really think Oswald killed Kennedy? The Warren Commision was a joke...I suggest you get a clue. Take a look at the world around you.
I already answered that. Then non-nuclear Pakistan tried to take control of Kashmir many times. No evidence has ever been produced to support the grassy knoll or any other such nonsense. I am 100% certain that Oswald killed Kennedy. I have no way of knowing if he acted alone or was financed by the Mob or LBJ or the Fed, and no credible evidence has ever been presented to make me think otherwise. Look at the world through a non cookoo filter and you can quickly answer 99% of the dumb questions you present.
The Arabs were part of the Soviet orbit back then. The Soviets would have provided the nuclear deterrent for the Arabs. The Israelis could not have nuked the Arabs without getting nuked themselves.
Look man, if you can't see through the Kennedy assassination then I cannot help you. But an interesting point on Kashmir. I will have to look into....appreciate the point.
Or turned a blind eye, but not all of them are that way. Certainly not the recent president whose wife was killed by radical terrorists. Pakistan has many well-educated and western-oriented people as well as many illiterate, desperately poor people. They do not speak with one voice and are not trustworthy. As soon as we are out of Afghanistan and no longer need Pakistani highways and airspace to supply them . . . I suspect we will completely reevaluate Pakistan as an ally. I really doubt it. Royal families have no interest at all in islamic revolutionaries. Osama has been isolated for 10 years. I don't imagine that he was involved in much day-to-day stuff or he would have been found before now. But there may be a lot of financial information captured. It would be nice to shut down whatever income stream AL Qadea has remaining.
The Soviets didn't invade Israel. You said name an instance where a non-nuclear state invaded a nuclear state. I just gave you one. You lose. If you don't understand the nature of that conflict, just say so and correct yourself. There's nothing wrong with not knowing-that's how reasonable people learn.
I think the Kashmir thing comes closer. The Arabs were counting on the Soviets giving the nuclear "cover" so to speak. From what I remember reading that was the situation....I'll have to look into some more but I'm pretty sure I'm right on that one.
No, they weren't. The Soviets knew the implications of using nukes against Israel even if Israel used them vs. the Arabs. Just because the Soviets sold weapons to the Egyptians and Syrians didn't necessarily make them allies, no matter what blustery words were spoken.
Of course, but I object you your flippant rejections of historical incidents with no explanation at all. Yes, the Gulf of Tonkin incident happened. There are various versions of what exactly happened, but there is no doubt that an incident occurred. Duhhh, try Egypt, Syria, and Jordan attacking Israel in 1973. Israel had a dozen nuclear weapons at the time and Phantom jets to deliver them. Argentina attacked Britain in 1982. Chechnya attacked Russia in 1999. What in the world are you talking about? Rife with logical fallacies. Irrelevant conclusions, false causes, and denying the antecedent. Your ignorance of science is profound. You are making false statements above here about the origin of life. Evolution is another process altogether. You understand nothing about either.
