By making the Morning After Pill available over the counter, you are taking it out of the hands of the government. The only problem with it is that it costs $30, which may be out of reach for some very poor kids who make a mistake. Hopefully this price will fall considerably as it becomes more popular. Some estimates say it will eliminate half the unwanted pregnancies in America a year, about 1.5 million. It will be each woman's choice, which is where it belongs. We don't need a bunch of uptight men on this message board or the government making the decision for her.
Do you really think that NOT having these pills available has done ANYTHING to "curb" the rate of teenagers having sex???? Yeah, I can see 14-16 year old girl saying, "Well, now that we have this pill available, I'll have sex with you" YEAH RIGHT!!! PLUS, just because they're over the counter DOESN'T NECESSARILY mean that there can't be an 18 year old limit on their sale. The only thing this pill will do is prevent THOUSANDS of unwanted pregnancies.
It will abort most of these "unwanted pregnancies". In most cases the egg does get fertilized but is not allowed to implant. You may not agree with that terminology, but there are many that do. You make a pretty bold statement in regards to the only thing this pill will do and use CAPs to drive home your point. Are you sure that there will be no health issues from extended or multiple use of this pill (which would happen more being over the counter)? Are you sure condom use will not even slightly decrease with this drug being over the counter, which may lead to the possibility of even higher rates of STDs? What are the effects of this pill on a fertilized egg if taken after 72 hours? I also find one of the reasons listed in article as suspect: It scares people into the need for this drug due to the possibility of failure by condoms and oral contraceptives, but are these people really going to know these items failed within 72 hours much less 24 hours. No, these for the most part would be in the 50% that this pill would not "help", so why would Barr throw them into their reasoning for this pill other than marketing their product to people who already use a contraceptive. Below are some other views. I am sure Pro-Abortion supporters will not agree with the sources, but they make some good medical points in regards to this pill being over the counter in addition to their other objections. http://www.morningafterpill.org/mapinfo1.htm Catholic link http://www.family.org/cforum/fnif/news/a0029455.cfm
The main organization of American gynecologists favors the sale of the morning after pill over the counter. I listened to the head of that group speak in favor of it on NPR. They see it as safe. Wendy Wright opposes this because she sees it as abortion. The health "concern" by her is a load of crap to mask that. If you oppose it because you oppose abortion, at least you should have the guts to say so. She knows she must lie to have a chance of stopping it. Over the long run, she may just do that. You probably have 4 members of the Supreme Court right now who would see the use of this pill as possible murder. Four more years of Bush will probably increase that number to 5 or 6.
You have answered just as expected without reading or at least comprehending the entire email and links. With more people like you against us we will definitely succeed. You put down one person's viewpoint, because of her politics on abortion, but you make your point based on a person who NPR puts one of their shows. Do you think anything that comes from NPR is unbiased?
its not my job to tell people not to have sex when they are not ready. its not my job (as a taxpayer and voter) to prevent people from buying drugs. both of those are parents responsibilities. the end.
The end if this was only about sex, but there is another life involved in a pregnancy besides the mother's.
we are gonna have to agree to disagree. i dont believe in the sanctity of human life. abortions dont bother me. i oppose murder for rational, not religious reasons. i oppose murder because if we allowed it, society would descend into chaos. this isnt true with abortion. mudering unborn babies doesnt cause any real problems. nevertheless i understand the opposing viewpoint, and respect it.