And Utah, who I'm guessing everyone wants to split, never beat Florida (who should win the NC) head to head. You can't have it both ways. If you justify one split title, you have to do the same with the other. OU lost their conference and still made it. USC got hosed, too.
In your thread, "Utah co national champs," he said: And then you guys went into the rest of your reasoning about Texas that I didn't read until now. But regardless, using the head-to-head argument isn't much different than saying a team that got blown out in their conference championship game (OU) should not have made it over a team that won their conference (USC). In both cases, each team got hosed and the split titles are to be justified, despite the fact that these teams have agreed to the terms of the BCS no matter how it turns out.
