New Arizona Immigration Enforcement Laws

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by OkieTigerTK, Apr 23, 2010.

  1. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    No problem, wetback.

    Why do you ignore that these safeguards already exist. Why do you imagine that profiling is a new issue? Every policeman in the country receives training on profiling and ethics. We don't put police training into each and every law. You are being patently ridiculous about this.

    Nobody is trying to oppress Americans, we are trying to suppress foreigners. Producing an ID is not abuse.

    It's about national identity, not race. There are black, white and brown Mexicans. There are black white and brown Americans.

    I know. Its a single-minded focus. You don't consider the big picture, the overall good of the United States, or the concept of "the lesser of two evils".

    Those rights are not violated. Identifying ones self has never been held to be "unreasonable search and seizure."

    Safeguards already exist. Look up "Central Arizona Regional Law Officers Training Academy" and "Arizona Law Enforcement Academy".

    You'll find "Ethics & Professionalism, Laws of Arrest, Search & Seizure, Rules of Evidence", etc. In every curriculum.

    Hell, Here is the ALEC curriculum: http://www.aleaonline.org/docs/basic_training_2005.pdf

    No, you asserted the police had no proper training in ethics without bothering to check. I just provided evidence that they do. If you are now assertting something else, you go do the homework and show me evidence that Arizona police profile without hindrance, records, or training. You must demonstrate you are right. THEN I have to prove you are wrong.

    You are reinventing the wheel, amigo. Police ethics is an old story with a long history and it has been addressed many, many times. The problem is not systemic and individual abuses must simply be prosecuted for abuse when it happens and clean house, as you say.

    I regularly spell out my position and you spell out yours. This is the way it works. If you need a clarification, ask for one. I dislike questions that presuppose an answer within the question. I dislike having my position distorted and then attributed to me. That is all.

    You sure ain't getting much support lined up behind you, Hoss. :lol:

    You don't pay close attention. I said that ID is required in most instances. You can't be stopped simply to produce ID. A policeman has to be asking for it in the legal performance of his duties.

    Don't be obtuse. Clearly a legal ID is a physical ID in this context.

    I suggest that this issue is no different than many other legal issues "fraught with emotion" that the police must deal with every day.

    Man. the paranoia here is yours. I don't think that the police are all out to get me. I don't think that that whites are all out to get browns. i don't think Americans are all out to get Mexicans. You have suggested these things.

    I think I've made my point here. And I think you are just being argumentative, now. Not that I'm in any position to object . . . :hihi:
     
  2. OkieTigerTK

    OkieTigerTK Tornado Alley

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2005
    Messages:
    18,000
    Likes Received:
    1,286
    fixed it for you.
     
  3. Indiana Tiger

    Indiana Tiger Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2005
    Messages:
    509
    Likes Received:
    26
    The only point I'll make with regards to training on racial profiling is that I never asserted there was no training. What you could say is that I asserted that there isn't a complete set of standards like the example I provided. Metrics and transparency are essential. It's kind of like I gave you a recipe to make bread; told you to make bread, but didn't give you any flour. The fact that you have yeast, water, and salt (and nothing else) means you can make bread. Likewise, having a training program, that in fact, I acknowledged as having well meaning people, which means I must think they exist, does not mean you have effective safeguards. So point me to the public results of statewide racial profiling monitoring efforts and internal reviews of racial profiling or race discrimination complaints, and if they cover all jurisdictions, I'll concede on the safeguards even if the results suck. I'm particularly interested in Arpaio's record.

    As I said, I've spent too much time on this, so we'll just have to agree to disagee. Respond as you will and unless you have a specific request, I'll just end it.
     
  4. Krypto

    Krypto Huh?

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,181
    Likes Received:
    272
    What is the big damned problem? If a cop asks you for identification, you have to show him you ID. If you can't produce it, they detain you till your info is validated.
     
  5. Krypto

    Krypto Huh?

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,181
    Likes Received:
    272
    also...

    [MEDIA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGqPo5ofk0s[/MEDIA]
     
  6. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    one of the more important things about a free society is that you cannot be detained without cause. the question is whether "looking illegal" according to a cop is enough cause. i dont think it is. the problem just isnt bad enough to justify that.
     
  7. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    The law does not consider "looking illegal" to be sufficient cause. Get off the street Rev. Al.
     
  8. OkieTigerTK

    OkieTigerTK Tornado Alley

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2005
    Messages:
    18,000
    Likes Received:
    1,286
  9. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    cops should have as few reasons as possible to detain folks. like for security or whatever. not to detain some workers who are about to commit the crime of picking vegetables or roofing my house. i need those services.
     
  10. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    They are not looking for reasons to detain folks. They are looking for perpetrators of criminal or unlawful activities. These do not include roofing and vegetable picking.

    Try and keep up, martin.
     

Share This Page