New Arizona Immigration Enforcement Laws

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by OkieTigerTK, Apr 23, 2010.

  1. Indiana Tiger

    Indiana Tiger Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2005
    Messages:
    509
    Likes Received:
    26
    Good Lord are you obtuse! How can you tell if someone is an illegal and not a US citizen in the United States by looking at him? What is the foolproof defining characteristic? Any failure in this determination under the AZ law means that the US citizen must prove he is not illegal which means he will be arrested and kept in custody until his citizenship is proved.

    I wonder what your response will be? Will it be an ignorant non sequitor? Will it be some ridiculous idealistic statement regarding the benevolent omniscient godly perfection of governmental authorities? Will you just ignore it? Or, will you just make up some crazy **** to deflect attention? You've used all these tactics in this thread and I wouldn't recommend over using any particular method. You've already firmly established your creds as the evolution/global warming denier of immigration, particularly hispanic immigration.
     
  2. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    red is trying to have a little fun with absurd catch-22s. citizens dont need to prove they are citizens because they are citizens. presumably this is determined by magic or faith.
     
  3. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    :lol:

     
  4. OkieTigerTK

    OkieTigerTK Tornado Alley

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2005
    Messages:
    18,000
    Likes Received:
    1,286
    ok, maybe im blonde. or need more diet dp. or both.

    but the quotes and what was added to one of them makes no sense. 'splain please sf?:huh:
     
  5. SabanFan

    SabanFan The voice of reason

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    26,080
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    See posts 188 and 197
     
  6. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Omniscience.

    They have already clarified that it won't be used to pull people over. But the police have always had to obtain the identities of suspects, perps, victims, and witnesses. They just had to ignore that illegals were illegals before. Now they have to be honest about it.

    I have been asked to show my ID in Canada. This ain't about racism, it's about nationality.
     
  7. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    The law doesn't say that at all, despite your hysterical disinformation. Citizens have nothing to fear and can stand on their rights. Legal immigrants have nothing to fear if they have their ID which they are required by law to carry anyway. Illegal aliens have no rights to hide their identity.

    The Arizona Lawmakers last week clarified the language to require scrutiny only of people who police legally stop, detain or arrest. Police will have no increased power to stop anybody than they ever did. They also changed a section of the bill that barred officers from "solely" using race as grounds for suspecting someone is in the country illegally. Now they will have to prove to a judge that other grounds were used.

    Why don't you just wait for it?

    Well, when someone tries to change the issue to criticize me personally, I know that they have exhausted their logic and lost the argument. If you are just going to be a pompous azzhole, I'm going to ignore you.
     
  8. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    I had been responding to SF earlier and still had his moniker in my copy memory. When I pasted it in the following post, I failed to notice that my new copy didn't take. So it got misattributed to a non-author.

    SabanFan is easily amused, darlin'.
     
  9. gumborue

    gumborue Throwin Ched

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2003
    Messages:
    10,839
    Likes Received:
    577
    i still wonder what "just cause" or "reasonable suspicion" is. my wife is not a u.s. citizen. she speaks english but with a strong nonAmerican accent. over the course of living for 14yrs here there have been several interactions with various law enforcement officials--busted for having beer at a state park, a few license and registrations for slight speeding, a couple wrecks. never has she been asked to show a visa or permanent resident alien card. or even asked if she was a US citizen. either as a driver or passenger. i imagine if she were brown or spoke with a different accent that would be different.
     
  10. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Just cause is used in civil vourt and means a legally sufficient reason. The laws are extensive and detailed.

    Reasonable suspicion is a legal standard that a person has been, is, or is about to be engaged in criminal activity based on specific and articulable facts and inferences. It is the basis for an investigatory stop by the police and requires less evidence than probable cause, the legal requirement for arrests and warrants. Reasonable suspicion is not a mere hunch and can require justification in court. Police may also, based solely on reasonable suspicion of a threat to safety, frisk a suspect for weapons, but not for contraband like drugs. A combination of particular facts, even if each is individually innocuous, can form the basis of reasonable suspicion.

    Probable cause is the standard by which a police officer has the authority to make an arrest, conduct a personal or property search, or to obtain a warrant for arrest. The most well-known definition of probable cause is "a reasonable belief that a person has committed a crime". Another common definition is "a reasonable amount of suspicion, supported by circumstances sufficiently strong to justify a prudent and cautious person's belief that certain facts are probably true.
     

Share This Page