My favorite Bushisms

GMan, what the hell do you know about the Teamsters? Were you ever in the union? Probably all you know is whatever lies you've heard from big business. I doubt seriously if you even know who the Teamsters or any other union are.
I was in it for 15 yrs. and damn proud to call myself a Teamster.



:geaux: :helmet: :lsug: :helmet: :geaux:

 

Re: NICELY DONE!

Name me 3 poiliticians in the past 30 years that wrote their own speeches

 

Ok waiter boy I mean film maker you have selective memory when it does not fit you fiction. You know who Wilson supported and supports now. It is kind of funny that a forty something year old theatre major that is still waiting tables and being someone's b*tch in hollywood is going to question others education. If I am not educated than considering we went to the same school what does that make you?

As for concealment I have seen nothing that supports that anything is being concealed. I am sure you can make up a story if you like instead of educated us with actual links.

We have not stopped fighting Osama. I guess you missed that part on your homepage/news.

People here have offered link after link and all you do is type your fiction. Can you at least attempt to offer something constructive to this forum?

 

Open your eyes

<As for concealment I have seen nothing that supports that anything is being concealed. I am sure you can make up a story if you like instead of educated us with actual links. >

http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2003/s902644.htm

http://www.amics21.com/911/oculta.html

http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20030804&s=dcorn

http://slate.msn.com/?id=2074678

There, get back to me after you wade through those and IÕll give you plenty more.

<We have not stopped fighting Osama. I guess you missed that part on your homepage/news.>

Wait a minute... you've probably been out of touch havenÕt you? Have you read yet about how our president has sent over 100,000 ground troops to Iraq? I'm guessin that somebody forgot to tell him that Osama ainÕt there.

The best guess is that Osama and his al Qaeda henchmen are in the area of Afghanistan. From what I can tell there are currently about 15,000 ground troops there now with about 8,500 of them being American. Supposedly there are not even enough forces there to provide security for the planned election, much less enough troops to relentlessly track down the still at large criminal of the century.

I don't know... is it just me or does seem odd to you too?

We're supposedly out to catch or kill the terrorist mastermind who is responsible for the greatest terrorist atrocity ever perpetuated against this nation either here or abroad, and we send our army on what President Prevarication evidently believes to be a more important mission.

The Saudis, who actually provided the pilots for the suicide planes used on 9/11 mind you, don't like us housing troops in their country so they have ordered their lap dog, Dubya, to carve out a new niche for those troops in Iraq.

Now, just reiterate for the sake of clarity, not only are Saudis committing terrorist attacks against this country, but as long as Bush is in the white house, they are also calling the shots on U.S. foreign policy.

 

The closest thing to a news site that you have posted - Slate (helped in its start by the left part of Crossfire would still make it questionable), and it is a negative article from 11/27/2002 about Kissinger and his past actions in the context of trying to explain why he should not head up the 09/11 commission, which is even funnier since Tom Kean is now the Chairman. I do not think Kissinger is even on the commission now.

I did not know it was this hard to prove your theories. It is like you are just pasting stuff from these homepages no matter when it was written and posting it here without checking to see if the links still make sense in the present.

Do you even know the differences between these two wars in regards to military strategy, execution, terrain, local help, and so forth? You are sinking even deeper.

 

<Do you even know the differences between these two wars in regards to military strategy, execution, terrain, local help, and so forth? You are sinking even deeper.>

Due to the fact that 9/11 only validates one of them, and the other is a favor we are doing for the Saudis in order to keep them happy after they financed, planned, and executed, the strikes on the aforementioned date, I can't say I really know why we are spending billions of dollars and losing American lives on a daily basis in Iraq with no end in sight. Would you be so kind as to explain in your own words why we are there?

 

I guess you do not. The homepage does not go over this (except for your Saudi X-Files theory of course)? You are 50 and have lived through a half a century of various military actions, and you cannot answer this.

 

<I guess you do not. The homepage does not go over this (except for your Saudi X-Files theory of course)? You are 50 and have lived through a half a century of various military actions, and you cannot answer this.>

Hey pal, I know that you have had your head buried in your terrorist proof bomb shelter for some time now, but come on out and look around. The whole world is wondering why Dubya invaded Iraq.

 

Again you go off subject and avoid answering the question. Film Maker, just think back to your post about the difference between numbers in troops between the two places.

No answer for your Slate post. That is another you went off subject on again. This forum is cluttered with examples of you doing this.