My favorite Bushisms

Do you not read a single word of anything that is posted?

I said, and I will type extra slow for you, "You have no idea how simple minded I am."

That means that I am more pathetically simple minded than you can possibly fathom. I am also more childish and more foul mouthed than I have let on in here.

See, that's the difference between you and I. I can admit to being a childish, simple minded, foul mouthed moron. You have a hard time admitting the fact that you are a douche bag.

Douche bag.

 

What a stooge...

<That means that I am more pathetically simple minded than you can possibly fathom. I am also more childish and more foul mouthed than I have let on in here.>

You must be proud of how far you have been able to elevate yourself in Mr. Bush's America.

It is becoming clearer to me why you are such a staunch Dubya supporter.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's a birds of a feather thing isn't it? Finally you have a president who is as foolish and mean spirited as yourself.

Interesting, although I had hoped it would be something more interesting and less pitiful than that.

 

Here's some great quotes...

"I did not have sex with that woman."

"It depends on what your meaning of the word is is."

"Vince Foster who?"

"I didn't inhale."

"Don't ask, don't tell."

"Monica, come out from under the table...the diplomats from Mexico are gone now..."

"Congress, I ask you to take Afghanistan off of trade restrictions!"

"We have stopped North Korea from developing Nuclear Weapons!"

ZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZzzzzzzzzzzzZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZ

 

WTF?

Why wasn't I informed?

Wait a minute...

That Clinton bashing don't work no more, TU. He ain't running for no public office that I know of.

If you can't defend your boy, Dubya, who is in the race, then what are you trying to accomplish here?

By bashing Clinton you're not going to get me to take shots at Richard Nixon, so don't even go there.

If your candidate is too stupid for you to feel comfortable defending then slink off somewhere else to conduct your revisionist history seminar.

 

Phat,

Why can't you post actual links so we can see for ourselves? Otherwise your posts are a waste of time film maker and have given us nothing that we need to defend. We know Hollywood and its wannabees are good at fiction, and we just want some proof of your "facts". Is that to much to ask an esteemed film maker like yourself? I know with the Oscars coming up you are getting your outfit and speeches ready, but I think you have a little time to back up your quotes.

 

Phathead = Rottenbowels

 

Revisionist history seminar...How have I tried to revise history?

You still haven't answered whether or not you feel like Stephen Hawking is worthy of his Ivy League education...I mean, after all, he can't speak without the help of a computer...

I'm using your logic...

 

you just revised history to send mr hawking to the ivy leage.

 

You're right about that CottonConstipatedBowels. Every single one of us us rich. We all live in palatial mansions, ride in limos or drive exotic luxury automobiles, fly around the world in our private jets to luxurious vacation spots while we opress and exploit the less fortunate. I even pay my rote slogan writer more every month than you make in 2 years just to make sure I never commit the social faux pas of being caught without the right rote slogan on my guest appearences on Rush Limbaugh's show or on Fox News.

By the way RottenBreath, do you have a job? In the unlikely event that you do you probably owe the fact that you get a paycheck to a rich Republican who gives a lot of money to keep Republicans like George W. Bush in office.

 

TU, is that the best you can do?

<Revisionist history seminar...How have I tried to revise history?>

Well, for one thing you seem to believe that Bill Clinton is running for President in the 2004 election. Forget about that guy, TU, he's just a private citizen these days.

Your boy, Dubya, is running against his horrifying record and a different challenger entirely. He has his work cut out for him.

As far as Stephen Hawking is concerned, I omitted comment on your earlier statement because I didn't want to further embarrass you. Stephen Hawking never either attended M.I.T. nor did he ever even apply to study there.

As I stated earlier though, you have a hell of a lot of nerve including Dubya in the same grouping with Stephen Hawking especially when the criteria is intellect.

Stephen Hawking is one of the greatest theoretical minds of the twentieth century. Just so you know though, at the time he first applied to college, he had not yet acquired Lou Gehrig's disease and must have appeared relatively normal to all whom he encountered. He has earned everything he has achieved in his life and is a man to be greatly admired.

Bush on the other hand has led a priviledged life where everything he has ever accomplished was essentially handed to him.