1. Be aware that martin and tirk are the same person.
  2. beaten

    already preempted that myth. still many steps ahead even before you thought of it.

    we already conceded that long ago


    Leave Red and the LSU faculty out of this.


    props to shane on the reverse psychology. not an easy feat after so many years of marriage.
  3. Really?

    Might make it but not promising where he'd get it served ;)
    1 person likes this.
  4. correct


    in that case, make it chocolate.
  5. I can't believe this argument has gone on this long. Men are bigger, stronger, faster, and more athletic, period. Given equal training and skill, men are better at sports.

    As for the original topic of the thread, best of luck to her, but if we ever need a female walk-on kicker to take the field, woe is us.
  6. I accede the point,... sad that girls/women have no place to play football.
  7. yes and equally sad only some men can have periods.
  8. Just might be good if she wears a cutoff flannell shirt.
  9. higher than older women, not higher than men. you seem to be forgetting what we are discussing. you appear to be accurately making the point that women are better athletes before they actually are women. this is of course a great point because what makes women women, their lovely curves and their sexy waist to hip ratio that makes them fertile and attractive, this is the same thing that makes them gawky at sports, its why the wnba is always crippled by ACL tears.
  10. exactly. you guys act like it is some sort of tremndous disrespect to women that they suck at sports. they still are magnificent beyond comprehension.

    there are lots of things women are terrible at. its ok because they dont need to be good at those things. dudes, we have to be awesome at stuff, we have to be funny all that crap. ladies, we like you already, no effort needed.

    mo issom, you dont need to kick fieldgoals, you are super cute and everyone loves you already. so forget it, you cant kick.