1. Brains are not a part of the recruitment process. Athleticism wins out with doofus.
  2. I'd go Tittle, way before my time, Jones, I was a pup, Hodson, Ro, Mett and that's it. Slot them where you like.
  3. Which is why your perspective is so skewed towards the unrealistic. You don't have to care. That's just the way it is regardless of whether or not you recognize it. Dismiss it or dislike it all you want. Reality cares not one bit.
  4. FWIW, Mett was not great but seems great because of Beckham and Landry.
  5. I can go along with that, no argument here
  6. He was great because of what else we had to compare him to. Compared to Lee, Jefferson, Jennings, and Harris he looks like Montana, he still got them the ball, OBJ and Landry wouldn't have helped much in 2014, maybe returning kicks or blocking, but Jennings wouldn't have gotten them the ball.
  7. Mett was legit. Most of his passes werent fucking acrobatic catches by the wr. we always try to our marginalize players when its convenient. thats stupid.
  8. He was a really good QB, I'd take him over any LSU QB save maybe Rohan since I've been alive.
  9. If you asked a group of UGA fans about Murray I'd bet 95%+ would have very favorable opinions of him: likely one of their two or three QB's of the Richt era. Mett was better than Murray.

    It's entirely feasible to think the UGA story we've followed the last year wouldn't be the same if Mett ...
  10. Good point