I'd start with finding a legitimate argument. Your statement about SEC teams not playing OU in home and home was not only debunked, but debunked twice. Using OU as an example of a good win isn't an issue. It was a good win for ND. However, using it in an effort to gain respect on the playing field is ludicrous. Spelling this out in even simpler terms. You're bragging about beating a team that lost to the team that finished tied for 5th in the SEC.
Against the barn, Tennessee, LSU, Shula was 1-11. That don't get you parting gifts on your way out of Tuscaloosa.
LOL...I still remember the barn going on about "fear the thumb", because they were about to make it five in a row. That's the kind of classiness that we've all come to expect out of jerdan-whore. Not quite worth killing century-old trees over, though.
NO you wouldn't. No bigger liars than the fanbase in Tuscaloosa exists! OU is an excellent example of the difference between ND and Alabama. Perfect. Look at your schedule.
I'll get back to you shortly. I'm in the middle of writing a short story about George O'Leary helping Manti with his personality profile on a new dating site.
@Smilodon On the Arizona St. deal, that game was the 2nd game of a home-and-home contract. The first game was scheduled to be played at LSU, but moved to ASU due to Hurricane Katrina. The 2nd was cancelled to bring in the TCU game, so LSU lost a home game on the deal. As to the future Oklahoma contract, its worth noting that the first game (in 2018) is to be played in Norman. If LSU were to postpone that game, its likely OU would tear up the whole contract, something LSU won't want to do.
