We need balance between extremes here. British-type gun control will never fly here and doesn't need to. On the other hand those advocating
no controls at all are not thinking this through.
Americans have the right to own guns, multiple guns, have carry permits, etc. That should
never change. But the gun-lobby has carried thing to extremes, wishing no limits at all, including people owning fully automatic weapons, have zero registration, licenses, permits or background checks, and allowing a citizen to purchase any number of guns at a time.
This has resulted in criminals being able to buy firearms easily--a guy can buy 200 assault rifles on a single day and transport then to Mexican drug gangs. Balance is what we need here.
I see no reason why a law-abiding citizen should not be able to own multiple guns for hunting, defense or simply to collect them. But . . .
- I see no reason why a law-abiding citizen would have any problem with registering these guns so that they can be tracked if used in a crime or stolen.
- I see no reason why law-abiding gun-owners don't have to have a license to own and use a gun to prevent convicted criminals, foreigners, and people with mental problems from legally obtaining or using guns. Hell, we license people to operate a vehicle or cut hair!
- I see no reason why law-abiding gun owners should have any need to buy more than one assault rifle a year (legitimate collectors excepted).
- I see no reason why law-abiding citizens have any need for full-auto rifles, grenade launchers, sawed-off shotguns, or machine guns (legitimate collectors excepted).
Click to expand...