Let's see what Trump, Fox, and Republicans are calling a vindication

I don't think you understand the concept of being politically compromised. Comey is not credible for this very obvious reason.

 

Yes, I claim criminal obstruction of justice. Comey's testimony lays out a case for that. But I also knew he would never accuse Trump of criminality. That wasn't the point of the hearing.

As for collusion with Russian hacking, which I'm certain occurred, whether or not Trump personally and knowingly participated are matters for discovery, but as the head of his team he has no valid excuse either way. Again, Comey accusing Trump of collusion wasn't the point of the hearing, either.

 

How is Comey "politically compromised"?

 

Rex suffers from PPE; Premature Political Ejaculation shot his wad too early on his Trump impeachment fantasy.

 

Trump isn't going anywhere until he is voted out in 4 years. The dude just has to deny everything and until there is concrete evidence like tapes..... and even then he will say they were made up so I just don't see him being impeached. We are stuck with him for worse or worse.

 

People lie under oath EVERY DAY.

As did Trump, of Comey, so what?

Everything about Trump is highly unusual- it's what we voted for, drain it.

He has also stated he did not trust the former AG yet he didn't take notes so the notes don't mean shit, necessarily.

He also leaked them but isn't sharing among different agencies a no-no? Oh that's right, Osama undid that RIGHT before he left office. Part of the back channeling.

Context? Can mean SO many different things. For one, very logical question given the unusual transition with the anti- Trump mindset and people running for the hills like idiots.

False. "Demanded" is not the right word. Words matter, remember?

Fail again. He said he HOPED he could let it go. See how you liberals add to make up your own script.

 

LOL. You really CAN'T be that dense.

Let's see... which of the two to believe? The man who has served under three presidents from two political parties, or the scumbag who lies so constantly he has broken the fact check site meters?

 

It's not a matter of what we believe; rather, what we can prove. Seriously.

 

Then why did you waste all that time typing? As for "proof" Mueller only has to convince a critical number of people with corroborating evidence for a criminal indictment. Many, probably most, have already concluded that Trump, himself, has already provided that evidence with his big stupid mouth.

 

Uh, to show proof of otherwise from what you were trying to say???