sorry, i forgot that we're no longer posting opinions on this board. btw, the "innate" came from sf's post
i think its up in the air that he's the fastest in the league (rondo and steele come to mind) it would count for something if he ran track. remember slip watkins? he was fast, but i wouldnt call him a talented football player. sorry for the reply if you were joking.
But I wasn't talking about talent relative to other talented individuals. I'm talking about talent relative to those who are not talented. Put me one on one with any of those guys and I get killed. I do not have talent. They do. The comment was made that Brady doesn't have an eye for talent. The players I listed have talent. Some, perhaps, more than others, but talent nonetheless. Now, if you want to say that Brady does not have an eye for superior talent, that is an argument. But I would take Brady's side on that one too.
Now, if you couldn't tell I was being sarcastic on that one, geez. I am trying to put together a little league baseball team and could use the help. :yelwink2: Guess we need to use emoticons with all posts.
My apologies. It was cajdav1's posts that I was referring to. Your argument supports exactly what I stated in the other thread - individually, we have talent, but together, we have not been a very good team.
