Politics Kevin McCarthy admits Benghazi Investigation a scam

I disagree. I didn't sign up for this shit. I hear John Boehner's punk ass for years talk about infrastructure if he could only find the funding. But they can investigate Benghazi where 4 fucking people died 100 times solely to smear a presidential candidate. This is bullshit on every level. They are so pathetic and can't win a fucking election for president so they stoop to throwing as much shit against a wall to hope it will stick. This is going to galvanize voters and it will backfire. I'm not too keen on HRC being the POTUS but it's gonna happen now. What's crazy is now this makes Bill Clinton look like a genius and they will be able to use this to their advantage.

 

Hillaryous. I think the Marx youth are missing the biggest point McCarthy really made, which is surprising because he's a dufus but even he was able to connect a few dots for everyone.

Republicans went after point A, but found point B. That's what you call a bonus. Had there been no investigation, nobody finds out about Hillarity's secret server. She's dishonest, to a fault and now everybody has proof.

And of course it's all political. Want to talk politics? Then you have to love the gem from one of Hillarity's emails about gay rights, particularly in light of her claim to have "evolved" on the issue.

"With plans to replace the words "mother" and "father" with "Parent One" and "Parent Two" on passport applications, the then-secretary of state refused to defend the policy shift in which the State Department describes as improvements that are being made "to provide a gender-neutral description of a child’s parents and in recognition of different types of families,” according to a 2010 press release.

According to the National Review, Clinton sent an email to top aides Cheryl Mills and Jake Sullivan for the secretive policy shift the next morning: "Who made the decision that State will not use the terms "mother and father" and instead substitute "parent one and two"? I'm not defending that decision, which I disagree (with) and knew nothing about in front of this Congress.......

Hillary continued to explode: “I could live (with) letting people in nontraditional families choose another descriptor so long as we retained the presumption of mother and father. We need to address this today or we will be facing a huge Fox-generated media storm led by [Sarah] Palin et al.”

The new emails show Mills quickly responding to Hillary's emails and promising she would be "reaching out to folks to find out." And, the National review notes that within a few days, the gender-neutral language had been removed from all U.S. passport applications.
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/hi...passports/2015/10/01/id/694191/#ixzz3nKHnVbJP


Real life is always more entertaining. Hillarity thinks the media have been unkind to her. Really?

"A staffer forwarded to Clinton's personal email account a gushing December 2010 note from magazine editor Tina Brown, making her pitch for how the secretary of State's image could be enhanced with a cover story in Newsweek.

In another note, Clinton's communications advisor at the department, Philippe Reines, alerted her to her 67% approval rating, and then remarked, "This is why we cooperate with so many profiles."

Other messages further illuminated Clinton's fumbles with modern means of communication. She could not figure out why messages she was sending to one aide were going to the woman's Gmail address instead of her government account.

Clinton said she did not know she even had the aide's Gmail address, then jokingly blamed the confusion on Chinese hackers infiltrating her server.

The irony was quickly noted by GOP opposition researchers Wednesday. They have charged that Clinton's use of a personal server for government business put the State Department at risk of a security breach -- and here Clinton was joking about the possibility."
http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/la-na-hillary-clinton-emails-20150930-story.html

 

Me thinks you are overreacting.....sort of like the police in Irving. This is how Washington works. Corruption and paybacks. Nobody is going to galvanize around a proven liar. Her numbers might go up but she is still terrified of a run by Uncle Joe. And that is saying something.

And MASTERMIND is spot on. Both sides do this. What do you think the Christie "bridgegate" investigation was really about?

 

So your reference is about a republican governor who shut down a bridge for political purposes.

Watch and see what happens. I want all of you to film yourselves when she wins the Presidency. It will be as good as the people who filmed their friends watching the Red Wedding.

 

My reference is to democrats who investigate republicans or republican groups. How about the IRS targeting republican donors or democrats wanting and investigation in to the group that outed planned parenthood's videos?

It wouldn't be any different than when the current office holder won....twice. Sometimes you get what you ask for. I can't wait to see what happens when schadenfreude comes home to roost.

 

But in spite of 9 investigations there has been absolutely nothing found that even remotely indicates something criminal happened. Watergate was indeed a crime, no question about it. Trying to compare the two is a reach, at best.

 

Not with tax payer money. Come on, where's your fiscal conservatism now? You okay with them wasting 4.5 million dollars on something that they admit isn't even about what they claim it is?

 

How about the $1B that will be spent in the general election?

 

Irrelevant. The Republicans went after Benghazi 9 different times, knowing that there wasn't anything criminal about it. The fact that they continued to investigate at the expense of tax payers while knowing nothing was criminal is a waste of tax dollars and a lot of them. Secondly, in spite of all the curfuffle around her server and e-mails not one damn thing has turned up about it. Nothing. Not one shred of evidence that she has done anything criminal at all. Nobody has proof of shit unless you listen to your conservative bloggers.

The rest of your post is deflection, deflection, deflection. You cannot seriously defend McCarthy's statement so you are trying to change the subject. Tough shit. This is about a bogus investigation conducted by a major political party and now they are doing nothing but bragging about it on national television. Where's your wish for accountability now?

 

Unethical is okay then, as long as it's not criminal? Is that the final take? She has 2 months of missing emails. How does that compare to an 18.5 minute gap in a tape?