I'll be honest, I hate Clinton and his wife. Love the presidency, hate Clinton. But I don't remember the hate-filled language being used by Republicans when he lied under oath and should have been thrown out. On some level, I love that these Dem's are so filled with hate for Bush.........with them calling him "Hitler" and "Evil" they are showing what they truly are.....just a party of left-wing extremist kooks. The more they let guys like Moore into their mainstream, the more regular people will be turned off and head to the Republican party. I also love that Bush gets to appoint 2 SC justices. I know that really chaps their hide too. Great stuff.
Spreading rumors, huh. Sourdough, All I have been doing is sharing published reports. I cite my sources, unlike a lot of folks around here. You know I supported the Afghanistan operation. We have already discussed it at length here--do a search. That job was done a whole lot smarter than Iraq. I supported Bush after 9/11 for months when he was uniting this country. But then he lost me with the Iraq blunders and his subsequent divisiveness in his bid to be reelected. Of course his economic policies have been a clusterfugg from day one. But I bet he is a really nice guy! My mom voted for him because he is a "good-looking young man". I bet he has some great stories at happy hour. I could listen all night. Then why don't you lay off comparing folks who disagree with you politically with terrorists, enemies of the people, and Klingons who fart in air locks.
Really? How about naming me a few? I'm talking about real scandals here...not things that have popped up and vanished overnight because there was nothing to them. And don't go telling me about a lack of WMD in Iraq, because I'll just counter with quotes from numerous prominent Democrats who all thought Saddam had them. How many indictments so far in this administration? How many people in this administration have gone to jail?
I don't ever remember comparing people who disagree to terrorists? The only thing I remember doing is talking about the Ted Kennedy's and Dick Durbin's of the world who appear to agree with the terrorists views about this administration at least, if not siding with them.
Oh, I can't mention the big scandals, huh. Life is too short, G-man. Try reading my FSA posts for the last year, you'll find a bunch of my opinions on the subject. I gotta go mow grass.
"I think it may be safe to say that you hate this administration just as much if not more than the terrorists"--Sourdoughman Geez Sourdough, you only said it about an hour ago.
Nice cop-out, Red. Just for your edification: "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002. "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seing and developing weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002. "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002. "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002. "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have alway s underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002, "He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do." Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002. "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction. "[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ... Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003. http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp Seriously, though, take it easy cutting the grass, buddy. It's hot out there.
I was being somewhat sarcastic but I got that from your own posts over the years of attacking the administration. I believed it to be true since all you have ever done is criticize and attack. Your the one with the war chant, posting ever negative thing you could find. The only other person that comes close is Rex! :hihi: :lol: Sorry, But I'm not the only one that thought you hated Bush.
THANK YOU FOR Stating the obvious! serious matter my azz, it's serious the left wants to make this administration villians, after all the egg is STILL on their faces from slick willy's tenure. So we just have to make a big hub bub about nothing. next time Rove should get a BJ in the Oval office and make it easier. :dis:
