For starters, there is very little this administration has done that I approve of. They're a bunch of arrogant, divisive, jerks. I still don't see what your point is in bringing that up. How much did Clinton do that you loved so much? Secondly, I'm not going to sit here and criticize an administration that's not in power right now. But I do bitch about Blanco quite a bit. I can't stand that whore. She is an embarassment. I'm getting tired of reiterating this, but the libertarian stance on social issues is generally liberal (unless you count gun control). Economically, it's a whole different ballgame. So what, SDMan? What's your point? That you and I are politically misaligned? You dodge my questions all the time, dude. Re-read some of the more recent posts of mine in this thread. You will find a plethora of unanswered questions posed by me.
when i get corrected i accept it and enjoy it. i think i am pretty good at telling the difference between typos and mistakes.
Let's see he is a dope head who makes some serious errors and then he wants to school others. I can see that. pot meet kettle.
Well, I guess, at least you did say that you didn't like Hillary once. Dude, I don't ever remembering dodging your questions so I'm not sure what you are talking about. I supported Clinton when he lobbed a couple of missiles at Al Quada but it wasn't enough then just like we found out on :911: If Clinton would've been man enough to blow up Afghanistan or have a war on terror then I would've supported him. I supported us in Kosovo because it was the right thing to do, no different than Iraq, really, we should've done something in Rowanda too. I didn't support him on abortion, gun control or gays in the military because we are politically mis-aligned. Also he was a suspicious figure because of all the scandals he was involved in, scandals in which people did go to jail. Just for the record, I was very skeptical of W when he was first elected in 2000. I thought and still think the reason he got elected is because he was the son of an ex-president, how often does that happen? I sure as hell didn't approve of how Bush handled the China thing when our pilots were in Chinese custody. I want a hard ass in office, someone that isn't going to take anything from anybody, I sure as hell don't approve of our handling of Mexico and Canada. The only thing that had me sold on W is the way he handled :911: , the words he said on the rubble that day, way he said it followed by actions. The only time I didn't vote for the lesser of two evils is when I voted for Reagan in 1984, the first time I could vote. We probably are mis-aligned politically but I just think its funny that you criticize republicans and pretty much ignore the other side, that is all. In some of our conversations I pointed out that both sides had faults and all you would do is attack the right and ignore the rest. Sometimes its hard for me to relate to you because you are so one sided in our conversations. Remember our talk about Isreal? You do realize the Palestinians are the problem, suicide bombers and all attacked Isreal for years like they did the WTC and in Madrid, London. You couldn't understand, you thought I was suggesting us attacking? In your own words, you talked about hypocracy of Isreal and their security violations and I pointed out that its hypocritical to go after Isreal and ignore their neighbors, the palestinians, the suicide bombers attacking Isreal. You can pick and choose which country UN rules should be justified by. Its simple, Isreal hasn't attacked its neighbors or used WMD's against its people or genecide, Iraq did, Bingo! You see, we are more than politically mis-aligned at times. Your making accusations so show me a conversation lately where I didn't answer your questions.
In addition to the 'in other words' phrase that I previously advised you to study, also research the meaning of the metaphor 'pot calling the kettle black.' Neither of those intricate verbal brainbusters can just be thrown around by any illiterate redneck.
So I guess you didn't reread those posts I was referring to, did you? Funny. You say all this pretty shortly after saying that you don't know where I stand on any issue. On top of that, you're accusing me of being one-sided, but have also very recently told me that you don't trust people whose stances are in the middle of the road on everything. Talk about being one-sided against me. Just accept the fact that we see things differently and allow arguments to take their course. I don't know why you suddenly have an issue with that.
Nice response. There you go nick picking again, so I learned where you stood on 1 or 2 issues until the last few hours. Well, I know you seemed to be against Isreal when you only brought up their UN violations while totally ignoring the Palestinian issue. That Iraq and Palestine are the problems because they attack their neighbors not Isreal, that is the real difference. Just another way to show your one-sidedness. Yes I wouldn't trust anyone that couldn't tell me where they stand or answer questions. I don't believe someone can be in the middle on abortion, gun control, taxes, etc. Your either on one side or the other, in these areas and a few others there is no middle ground. If you took middle ground with these issues or played a game show host here I wouldn't trust you, that is correct in that kind of case. Before you get to excited I do realize that you are now against gun control and a few other things but look what it took to find out the truth. You should be happy that I opened up and told you the total truth about Bush and tried to have a normal conversation with you.
BTW, I asked you to show me since you were accusing me of dodging questions. Why should I waste my time when your the one that has something to prove not me. If you actually found something I really would apologize to you because that isn't the way I do things because I don't like it when people dodge my questions.
