Justice Scalia found dead; The balance of the Supreme Court about to shift

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by islstl, Feb 13, 2016.

  1. Jmg

    Jmg Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    10,757
    Likes Received:
    6,425
    Correct. Then Jeb or Bloomberg will nominate someone sensible and they will sail through the nomination.
     
  2. HalloweenRun

    HalloweenRun Founding Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    7,480
    Likes Received:
    4,967
    Initially I had said impossible, but waffled a bit so as not to be a know it all.
     
  3. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,753
    Likes Received:
    23,932
    And it shouldn't happen now. The dems want to push because quite a few cases are coming up and a 4-4 split means the lower court ruling stands. This would favor the right in many of these cases.
     
  4. Bengal B

    Bengal B Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2002
    Messages:
    47,986
    Likes Received:
    22,994
    Are you the Anti-Red?
     
    HalloweenRun likes this.
  5. asignupe99

    asignupe99 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,549
    Likes Received:
    1,100
    Not true...Reagan did it.
     
  6. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,753
    Likes Received:
    23,932
    Kennedy?
     
  7. Winston1

    Winston1 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    12,048
    Likes Received:
    7,423
    Not exactly. The vacancy occurred in 1987 and Reagan nominated Robert Bork whose innacurate and callous savaging by the democrats in the senate gave rise to the term Borking and in truth started the tit for tat nomination battles of the last 30 years. Bork was eminently qualified and held positions no less radical than Ruth Ginsberg or Sonja Sotomayor and only for partisan political reasons dos democrats fight him. By the time Bork was defeated it was 1988 and Reagan nominated Kennedy who was approved. If the Ds had done what they now urge the Rs to do things would have been different.
    Pot calling the kettle black here.
     
    uscvball likes this.
  8. uscvball

    uscvball Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2006
    Messages:
    10,673
    Likes Received:
    7,156
    Exactly. The nomination process was begun prior to the start of Reagan's last year.

    Funny ironic post here. After Bork but prior to Kennedy, there was a 9-day run by Ginsburg. He withdrew after admitting to pot smoking and all the cons went nuts. I think Reagan probably didn't care but with Nancy's just say no stupidity and the war on drugs, there is no way an admitted dope smoker would get confirmed.
     
  9. MLUTiger

    MLUTiger Secular Humanist

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2001
    Messages:
    4,606
    Likes Received:
    810
    I'm not sure where you get this info from, but I am guess it's Fox News, Brietbart or one of the other GOP Propaganda machines. Not only has a Supreme Court Justice been nominated and confirmed in an election year, but it has happened 14 times (actually 17 times, but we won't count the ones made in December, AFTER the election was completed but still technically in an election year).

    They are as follows:
    1. Oliver Ellsworth, 1796
    2. Samuel Chase, 1796
    3. William Johnson, 1804
    4. Philip Barbour, 1836
    5. Roger Taney, 1836
    6. Melville Fuller, 1888
    7. Lucius Lamar, 1888
    8. George Shiras, 1892
    9. Mahlon Pitney, 1912
    10. John Clarke, 1916
    11. Louis Brandeis, 1916
    12. Benjamin Cardozo, 1932
    13. Frank Murphy, 1940
    14. Anthony Kennedy, 1988
    125 days is the longest confirmation period for a Supreme Court Justice. I am sure that this one will break the record, but it will not take 330+ days like many here hope. Not even the current Republicans are that inept, bitter and ignorant. That would be a new low for politics.
     
  10. mobius481

    mobius481 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2006
    Messages:
    7,731
    Likes Received:
    1,350
    MLU is right unfortunately. Republicans will piss and moan but there's no precedent for not allowing Obama to do his job.
     

Share This Page