Friend I am just a little confused about this. You taught me that theories do not require any evidence whatsoever to be valid. Dd you make a lil mistake?
My original comment was made as a facetious statement... then you throw insults like a child, hence my reply. But it's fine, if you want to meet up with me i'm game.
More than a little bit, Hoss. I thought we had dropped this matter. not take it from thread to thread. We enjoy these debates but it bores the hell out of the citizens. No, you keep repeating the same mistake. Validity refers to whether or not a theory is acceptable. You keep insisting that they are not. I, and the dictionary, history, and all philosophy, say that one can theorize about anything and it is valid to do so. It it not necessary that theory be proven to be true to be stated. The very idea is absurd and smacks of someone who doesn't understand philosophy as well as he imagines.
Isn't he a 4,000 year old earth guy? Uhmmm....The Republicans are gonna do it to themselves again. The Reps are worse than Dems. The leading Dems are basically good people that don't understand that not everyone is good. They think all the trash, will act and think like they do, if only given the opportunity. WRONG. Trash is trash, A-holes are A-holes, most people suck. The Republicans basically think everyone but them is an A-hole ( for the most part, true) but are so self absorbed, they cannot or will not come up with a viable candidate. Most being the key work. The most voters determine elections! Geez, it seems so simple.
you are right, we have discussed it enough. i will continue to be at a loss as to the value of random words, jibberish, the typed letters of monkeys, and "theories" that you consider valid, based purely on the fact that words have been imagined.
