Jindal is toast/ Marco Rubio will be our next President

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by LSUTiga, Feb 7, 2013.

  1. mancha

    mancha Alabama morghulis

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2011
    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    3,242
    There is a lot of public support for the banning of some weapons but that support fades as you go down the list of guns. As long as our govt is an elected govt, there is only so much that they can do.

    If they were to lose Red's support then what?
     
  2. LSUMASTERMIND

    LSUMASTERMIND Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Messages:
    12,992
    Likes Received:
    2,461
    under what logic would people believe this?
    You would have to change through a constitution amendment and that takes 2/3 votes. Guess what not even some democrats would vote for this. So unless people really claim to follow the constitution, they clearly dont no the rules, therefore have a false fear.
     
  3. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,702
    Likes Received:
    16,643
    It doesn't matter if you or anyone else thinks its logical or even possible.

    Need proof?


    Religion.


    People of religion believe many crazy things, like being saved or suffering in Hell. That's a false fear, but you know, its a valid theory and all.
     
  4. LSUMASTERMIND

    LSUMASTERMIND Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Messages:
    12,992
    Likes Received:
    2,461
    dude you are smart, seriously answer the question.
    why do people freak out like this.
    how would they retroactively take people guns
    the number of guns own by private citizens is over 200 million vs the number of police and law enforcement around 1 million.
    how would they do it.
     
  5. LSUpride123

    LSUpride123 PureBlood

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    Messages:
    33,702
    Likes Received:
    16,643
    Dude I think it's as stupid as you do.

    What I am saying is that people think crazy shit all the time.

    Its normal for people to have wacked out assumptions that make no sense what-so-ever!!
     
  6. LSUMASTERMIND

    LSUMASTERMIND Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    Messages:
    12,992
    Likes Received:
    2,461
    im there with you on that, because it would be impossible you would have to have the military do this.
     
  7. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    I think the reference is to another thread where red was incredibly inclusive as to what theories he deems reasonable. Evidence not required.
     
  8. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Inaccurate The administration is trying to ban new sales of high-cpacity magazines and assault rifles (2200 sport rifles are exempt). They are not trying to ban ownership.

    I would call it paranoid delusional.
     
  9. martin

    martin Banned Forever

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    19,026
    Likes Received:
    934
    123 and I call it a philosophical theory
     
  10. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Then state your theory clearly. It is fine for you to do so. Then I can label it paranoid and delusional if it so merits.
     

Share This Page