It'd be nice if the soft porn on this site would go

let's be honest here, those of us who appreciate beautiful women probably get more by accident than you uptight morons get on purpose. There are TF members here who have met me and know my wife and I have a wonderful life together.

Hugh heafner probably has been with more women than King Solomen yet by your definition because he appreciates and publishes the female form he doesn't see enough flesh? Go figure! :dis:

Your argument has huge gaping holes in it. Ludicrous. and my sig meets the curent guidelines of this forum. if you do have a problem with it, send Brett or myself a PM. Basiclly that's all that remains to be said here.

YOU SAID IT! :thumb:
the non contributors are hard to please! LOL

 

why cant you just argue that we should follow the rules so we dont get people in trouble at work? why do you have to make personal attacks? we have no idea. for all we know, tirk (who enjoys putting sluts in his sig) sees more "flesh in person" than hugh hefner. why make things up? you are right, we should obey the rules and chill out. but why say things you do not know to be true? accusing people of being childish and "compensating" by posting sluts, thats kinda childish too.

 

None of the posters on this forum can be compared to Hugh Hefner. In fact, Hugh makes his money off of exact types of people I am talking about.

In your defense though, you're sig isnt quite as bad as a few and it wouldnt necessarily result in any problems at my work. There are others that are not so tame though and you know that.

 

I call it how I see it. We all have our opinions my friend. One shouldnt be insulted by any type of accusation if it isnt true.

 

i am not insulted, you werent even referring to me, i have never posted any pics. i was hoping you would learn that you lose credibility if you say thing that you cannot know to be true.

 

It's a good thing I care about my credibility with a site full of strangers that I will never meet. That's certainly something to lose sleep over. :dis:

 

fine. in general arguments are more sound when you do not make personal attacks. if you want to be wrong i encourage you to disagree.

i will say it this way. the smarter angle for you to take would have been ask people to obey the rules and not make personal attacks or make baseless claims about people.

 

This sounds a lot like the Golden Rule. Is that what you mean Martin :grin:

 

well, i am slightly guilty too, because i was amazed that jsracing was, in my opinion, continuing to taunt the rules, so i said "can you read", which probably wasnt the smartest thing for me to say. but an even stupider thing would be just to start calling people out and claiming they like to post pics because they are losers who never get any.

 

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=opinion