It'd be nice if the soft porn on this site would go

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by LSU, Dec 18, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 12 of 12
  1. tiger fan 2001

    tiger fan 2001 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2003
    Messages:
    1,987
    Likes Received:
    5
    Some of us work shift work. If I stayed of the internet I would drop off the facew of the earth for 14 days. Has nothing to do with my stance on pics, just saying some of who use it at work are without choice.
     
    tiger fan 2001, Dec 18, 2004
    #111
  2. Texican

    Texican Freshman

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2003
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Oh yeah, it sure was addressed. Got eyes?
     
    Texican, Dec 18, 2004
    #112
  3. crawfish

    crawfish Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Messages:
    3,592
    Likes Received:
    149

    Get a life dude.......
     
    crawfish, Dec 18, 2004
    #113
  4. Texican

    Texican Freshman

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2003
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Typical tigerforums reply. You must be a very loyal...I mean, PAYING member.
     
    Texican, Dec 18, 2004
    #114
  5. crawfish

    crawfish Founding Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Messages:
    3,592
    Likes Received:
    149
    loyal? it's just a little message board for fans.......

    Are you with us or against us?

    I pull for LSU

    This whole thread is silly, imo..
     
    crawfish, Dec 18, 2004
    #115
  6. Texican

    Texican Freshman

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2003
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Im all for pulling for LSU. This has nothing to do with LSU. Surely you understand that. It's about being a fan and not being able to surf this site, as a fan, from certain places because of the offensive material. It's not about being "with" anyone.
     
    Texican, Dec 18, 2004
    #116
  7. islstl

    islstl Playoff committee is a group of great football men Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2003
    Messages:
    46,115
    Likes Received:
    9,705
    as soon as you saw the new guidelines laid out, you scurried about to find a pic that you thought you could get away with but still manage to offend as many people as possible.

    classic.
     
    islstl, Dec 18, 2004
    #117
  8. Mr. Peabody

    Mr. Peabody Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2003
    Messages:
    3,061
    Likes Received:
    141
    I wish there was a thead for those pics instead of them being posted on sigs.

    That way the people that wanted to enjoy them could just click on those threads.

    A lot of times when I click on a thread and start reading posts, I have to look over my shoulder and make sure one of my kids or my wife isn't walking up behind me.

    I would be embarrassed and have a very tough time explaining that I'm just posting on a sports message board and not looking at porn.

    Just my two cents.
     
    Mr. Peabody, Dec 18, 2004
    #118
  9. BRETT

    BRETT LSU FAN Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2001
    Messages:
    3,073
    Likes Received:
    672
    So I’m reading Texican’s responses and trying to figure out what this guy wants and what his beef is with me.

    One statement he says: “I don't go to this site at work either anymore”

    So I figured he’d be happy with the new rule forbidding obscene pictures. Then he says:
    “but I have to resort to that [disabling signatures] because the board administrators value the business of these neanderthals more than they care about the input of others.”

    So I think, maybe he didn’t read my post. http://www.tigerforums.com/showthread.php?t=23012&page=4&pp=15

    Next, I read Texican’s statement: “What do we have here? Looks like we CANT type "dirty" words!! Oh my!! Can these words also be considered offensive? Does the sticky about signatures also say that images in signatures cannot be offensive?
    What a paradox.”

    Next he states: “I used to come here quite often but stopped as soon as the content became unacceptable for me to view at work.”

    First he criticizes me for allowing obscene content that makes it impossible for him to view the site at work now he’s criticizing me for enabling the forum features that blocks a few obscene words. Then again he goes back to criticizing me for not blocking obscene material.

    Next in response to the assertion that I didn’t respond to him Texican states: “Get used to it!”

    So by now it’s very clear that Texican has some sort of agenda with me. I’m curious about what I had done to piss this guy off so I go back and review my personal messages and discover that I had deleted several posts of his because he was offering the domain names of several LSU players for sale. I informed him that “cyber squatting” had been determined in several circumstances to be illegal and I wouldn’t allow him to use TigerForums.com to sell them. I had also deleted a few other questionable posts of his. He was not happy with my decision at all.

    Since Texican has taken it upon himself to publicly disparage me and TigerForums, it is only fair to respond to his negative agenda.

    LSUBayouBengals. You contacted me with a petty issue concerning the user reputation system that quite honestly is the type of issue that I usually don’t have the time to address. I do my best to answer everyone but depending on the importance of the issue and my current schedule some things do get passed over. I’m sorry.

    This issue has been resolved.
     
    BRETT, Dec 18, 2004
    #119
Page 12 of 12
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page