Is it time to lower the Corporate Tax Rate?

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by LaSalleAve, Mar 29, 2011.

  1. Rex_B

    Rex_B Geaux Time

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2003
    Messages:
    3,926
    Likes Received:
    187
  2. mobius481

    mobius481 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2006
    Messages:
    7,731
    Likes Received:
    1,350
  3. Rex_B

    Rex_B Geaux Time

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2003
    Messages:
    3,926
    Likes Received:
    187
    Revenues
     
  4. mobius481

    mobius481 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2006
    Messages:
    7,731
    Likes Received:
    1,350
    I never said anything about revenues. As our politicians have shown us time and time again, we don't need the money to spend it. I said, i doubt we can run the country on less than a trillion bucks. We haven't done it in the last 25 years and that's not inflation adjusted. So while I agree, we have to get much smaller, much more quickly, you can only get so small and that's not small enough to get rid of all income and payroll taxes. Now if we're just talking about corporate taxes, yes, that's doable but we have to cut spending first. We can both probably agree on that.
     
  5. Atreus21

    Atreus21 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Messages:
    1,660
    Likes Received:
    522
    It's the government's responsibility to collect taxes, not GE's to hand over it's own legitimate earnings because of the government's inability to close loopholes.

    Any tax reform that takes place right now, even if it's horrific, will be an improvement on the gigantic cluster**** that is our tax code. I accept the premise necessary to pass Obamacare (namely the "DO SOMETHING, ANYTHING" premise) when it comes to the tax code.
     
  6. TBTrumpet

    TBTrumpet Founding Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    2,068
    Likes Received:
    1,562
    It will never matter how the government taxes individuals and businesses because the spending problem is not solved.

    The national government takes in about $2 trillion in revenue per year. How about it try to only spend $2 trillion per year before we start changing how the money is collected.
     
  7. Swerved

    Swerved It appears my hypocrisy knows no bounds.

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2003
    Messages:
    4,291
    Likes Received:
    1,503
    You mean spend less than we make? What a novel idea! :rofl:
     
  8. Rwilliams

    Rwilliams Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2010
    Messages:
    3,857
    Likes Received:
    183
    Balanced budged amendment
     
  9. LSUsupaFan

    LSUsupaFan Founding Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2003
    Messages:
    8,787
    Likes Received:
    1,207
    Because the statement is intellectually dishonest. What liberals call subsidies rational people call cost of business discussions. Oil companies are taxed at every phase of the process why should they not be able to deduct those costs.
     
  10. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Spin. They are called subsidies by the Congress that issues them. Are you trying to suggest that the oil companies don't get tax subsidies?

    .R.601 - End Big Oil Tax Subsidies Act of 2011

    ENDING OIL INDUSTRY TAX BREAKS

    Because they don't need to be subsidized. They are very profitable and yet get away without paying taxes in the US. Other countries get theirs, of course. What about free enterprize? Subsidies don't play into it.
     

Share This Page