I'm at my wits' end.

Discussion in 'The Tiger's Den' started by Atreus21, Nov 12, 2007.

  1. BrettStah

    BrettStah Tiger Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2003
    Messages:
    1,007
    Likes Received:
    69
    You are preaching to the choir, but your original post was about LSU, and the chances of being left out being mostly due to luck, correct? That is what I was referring to... an undefeated LSU is not going to be ranked #3 behind teams with 3 or 4 losses. It just won't happen.
     
  2. Atreus21

    Atreus21 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Messages:
    1,660
    Likes Received:
    522
    We sure hope it won't. I bet Auburn and USC aren't as optimistic.
     
  3. clair

    clair Rockets

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Messages:
    10,627
    Likes Received:
    429
    how is strength of schedule unfair?

    in your opinion is beating Nicholls by 2 more impressive than losing to Florida by 2?
     
  4. TigerBait3

    TigerBait3 Guest

    This has been my point all along.

    No one will ever be happy and we will still have controversy as to who makes it into the playoffs/BCS.
     
  5. Atreus21

    Atreus21 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Messages:
    1,660
    Likes Received:
    522
    Strength of schedule is unfair because we start deciding if one 11-0 team is better than another 11-0 team by some criterium other than the only one that makes sense: Who won a head to head competition between the two.

    In the absence of the possibility of a head-to-head, we have to assume that we don't really know who is better. Yet that's not what we do, and that's certainly not what the BCS does.
     
  6. BrettStah

    BrettStah Tiger Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2003
    Messages:
    1,007
    Likes Received:
    69
    USC and Auburn would never finish ranked #3 behind two 3 or 4 loss teams either.
     
  7. clair

    clair Rockets

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Messages:
    10,627
    Likes Received:
    429
    so it's unfair to say that an 11-0 Hawaii team who played no top-25 ranked teams is worse than an 11-0 LSU team who played 6-7?
     
  8. Lprimo

    Lprimo Pimpin Aint Easy

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,069
    Likes Received:
    114
    Rankings are based on you past performance, and who's returning on each team, period. That's what pre-season polls do, arrange teams from the year prior. Once the season unfolds, it is wins against quality teams that move your team up and down the polls. It use to be up to just humans, who played in the NC game. Now theres BCS, and it's not going anywhere. It's unfair some years...ie Auburn. But it's all we have. Could you imagine a play off system? How wore out would a team be, after 3 play off games, when they just finished a 13 game season! thats nuts...Bottom line is, if you are not good this year, you will not be ranked next year. If you win big games, and beat ranked teams...then you will move up...ie Oregon, KU 2007.
     
  9. BrettStah

    BrettStah Tiger Fan

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2003
    Messages:
    1,007
    Likes Received:
    69
    :confused:

    How could two 11-0 teams have had a head-to-head matchup?

    Serious question... have you been drinking today, Atreus21?
     
  10. Atreus21

    Atreus21 Founding Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2003
    Messages:
    1,660
    Likes Received:
    522
    Yes, it's unfair. Because the rankings are subjective, and based on prior performance.

    And even if they were objective, it doesn't mean an 11-0 Hawaii team would lose to an 11-0 LSU team.
     

Share This Page