It's really too bad that Clayton went pro. I think he made the right decision. But he surely would have been very valuable in showing these young receivers how downfield blocking is done. TE, you my friend, are a piece of work. That's as politely as I could put it.
Trust me, they've been taught plenty by Bobby Williams...It's how you deal with adversity, and how you respond to the things your taught...How you process information... They had a rough go of it...They will learn.
istlstl...If I'm a piece...Then that must make you a tool, right? I've figured you for one all along, buddy... ;-)
Damn FightinTiger, I am really starting to like you (just not the way TE likes you). I can't give you another rep point on this one just yet. I gotta go give a rep point to another member first.
actually he was playing with a few future pro bowlers and no, it didnt matter. there is plenty of blame to go around...from the offensive line to the play calling to the routes ran by receivers. But the O Line did not give up one sack and Randall couldnt complete a simple screen pass 10 feet from him. He was done before it started. dont get me wrong, I think randall can and will be MUCH better and help this team to vicitories and many here that are dogging him will prolly be eating crow or ignoring the fact Mucous will be needed sooner than later for a successful LSU season.
And Oregon State coaches did their rain dance too and the heavens opened up and ... all of a sudden ... according to you Randall can't throw the ball ... :shock: If that's true, then you are indicting the entire LSU coaching staff and their judgement of the talent they have ... their coaching responsibilities, etc or you're just fullo **** ... one or the other :hihi: What happens to your theory if and when Randall leads LSU to a big lead in the first half on a dry field? Well, after Nick's talk show tonight ... I know what Nick Saban believes about Russell's "miraculous show" ... and so does Crawfish :rofl: IMO, I think the young kid did a good job on his first outing ... especially fortunate not to get those picks ... but he's still not ready for an Auburn defense ... Let's see his numbers improve greatly on a HOPEFULLY "dry" field ... then I'm sure he'll start to receive more and more PT. You should call Nick's show next Wednesday and bleed on him a bit about it ... :rofl:
There was word that JR only knows 1/4 of the playbook. If that were true, that may explain why he may not be as ready. I think the real test for MR is when the team does play better; only by then I think it will be fair to gauge his true ability. Again,as a reminder, he had games when he handlled the offence quite well in the 2002 season, including the Arkansas game and first half of the Cotton Bowl. ________ Medical Marijuana Best Rated Dispensaries In The South Bay Area 90744
First and foremost...I've said that I was wrong...I'm unafraid to admit that I was incorrect about Randall. He's not ready-yet. It's the 1st game. I also think that Russell should go ahead and take his lumps...Until I'm proven otherwise... I've also stated that I hope I'm wrong about Randall-twice. Fightin(Insanity)TIGER has still not explained his comment from a day or two ago about how Saban started Randall because he was "obligated" to do so. Either Saban has lied for going on 5 years now, and feels obligated to start fifth year seniors (Which'd explain Adrian Mayes starting every game last year, as well as Bennie Brazell starting the OSU game this year, right Fightin(Insanity)?), or he is lying... Which is it, Fightin(Insanity)? Has Saban lied about "Playing the best 11 at each position who give us the best chance to win" this whole, entire time, or are you just-like ramah says-full of sh!t? Again, you get no lifelines...and only a single attempt to answer a very simple, very direct question... Has Nick Saban lied, or are you just stupid?
Watch for the pithy attempt to NOT answer a real easy simple direct question, here, everyone...It's an either/or question, and I'm just simply posing it to him for the 3rd or fourth time here on this site... What's the over/under on whether or not he'll answer, or whether he'll just try to demean my intelligence and then crow about Marcus Randall being a nogoodnocountsumb!tch...
