I thought this was FREE SPEECH Alley

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by CParso, Jun 17, 2008.

  1. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    No, it wasn't. It was closed because it was degenerating into an off-topic argument and would have led to the whole thread being deleted, which it was not. This one is not looking good . . .
     
  2. saltyone

    saltyone So Mote It Be

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Messages:
    7,647
    Likes Received:
    483

    See, there you go again. By the way, I knew the "us" would get you. :hihi: I mean, it's always "us" against "them"...right?

    You preached on in your post as if I didn't know that obama couldn't win the white house with just the black vote. You figured that I would find it surprising that many, many whities voted for the guy. I guess I should have just said "Duh" and left it at that. For now on, when speaking with you, I will use small words and be very specific about my meaning. It pains me to see you so confused so often.

    As far as clinton goes...you didn't hear? He was the first "black" president.
     
  3. saltyone

    saltyone So Mote It Be

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Messages:
    7,647
    Likes Received:
    483

    You think I'm different in person? Whatever. If anything I tone down my opinions on here...out of respect for our diverse group of members. Trust me, I would tell you how I feel in person.
     
  4. TigerBait3

    TigerBait3 Guest

    I wonder why. ;)


    When it comes to large groups of people, blacks will vote higher than any other group when it comes to identity and party affiliation, which will easily be in favor of Obama.

    But those percentages don't tell the whole story since the election is obviously not determined by the popular vote. His speeches will change state by state, and they will not be directed just towards blacks.
     
  5. lsu-i-like

    lsu-i-like Playoff advocate

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    17,958
    Likes Received:
    8,799
    Mastermind, do you support erasing that word from the English language? Why is it so insulting that you can't get past it?
     
  6. luvdimtigers

    luvdimtigers Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,574
    Likes Received:
    308
    It didn't become the "n" word until the O.J. trial.

    I remember because the defense team had no problem using profanity in the courtroom, but not the dreaded "n" word
     
  7. CParso

    CParso Founding Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,852
    Likes Received:
    368
    Only from the cracka dictionary. Black people are still allowed to use it.
     
  8. TheDude

    TheDude I'm calmer than you.

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2006
    Messages:
    4,439
    Likes Received:
    717
    Well it is a hateful word, and it's a pity that segments of the black population have adopted it for their own purposes, because it has prolonged the misery of the word. How different might things be if blacks used "dude" instead? Would the "n word" be forgotten? There are a couple of awful words that you just can't call women either. They will never forgive or forget it. Just better to leave it out of your personal dictionary, imo.
     
    2 people like this.
  9. Contained Chaos

    Contained Chaos Don't we all?

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    9,467
    Likes Received:
    2,124
    Don't get mad at me, get mad at Chris Rock. He's the one that said it, I just quoted him.

    It's just a freaking word, and not one that was directed at you or anyone else. You are being entirely too oversensitive and are disingenuously making yourself out to be a victim. I am not sorry about it, and I will not apologize.

    Good day.
     
  10. Crip*TEAM KATT

    Crip*TEAM KATT As Wild As We Wanna Be

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2003
    Messages:
    9,850
    Likes Received:
    463
    Ok first off Free Speech Alley is NOT a Public Forum.

    We all PAY for the privilage to be able to post here.


    Being such as along as the content stays within the User Agreement, and stays on topic with the thread title and is not a PERSONAL ATTACK on another poster there is no other reason someone should be offended by the content.

    And even if someone was offended, I am not aware of anywhere we have the right to "NOT BE OFFENDED". If you find yourself in a situation that is offending then you need to remove yourself.

    Just an example I am offended by the global warming talk, because I think it is simply scare tactics, so do that mean I get to report or close any threads that have talk of global warming?

    Who determines how much offensiveness can be allowed, or we gonna ask every single person what offends them and then get rid of it?

    I am offended by some rap music, so I am gonna lead a protest and donate enough money to have the governement outlaw rap music!

    Hitler was offended by the Jews and that didnt work out so well!
     
    1 person likes this.

Share This Page