I do appreciate you telling me who you was when you gave me red, and by the way I wasn't complaining, I was just saying I got red for asking a question.
Martin is dead on with his view on this.....and by "dead on", I mean that "I" agree with him. you need to realize that if someone just goes around giving red for the hell of it is most likely not a very active member (Tirk excluded :hihi: )......therefore their opinion does not affect your score very much if any. I personally like it the way it is!
hopefully, it was me and not grad. i have a fight club rule, no talking about rep. :rofl: :rofl: rules are rules. ask anyone in this thread. i even tried to give myself red now im in it. maybe you guys can help me out.
you gave me a red mark the other day, and i would have to say deservingly so...and you put your name on it i thought that was big of you....and i didn't retaliate...cuz that's just plain juvenile
Well im not going to do something childish and give you red back, but why say "good post" and leave red rep? Then come back the next day and say "tirk rules" and leave red rep? Or is someone using a fake name?
lmao, i cant give neg for the same post or twice in two days so yeah i have an impersonator. me giving red for discussing rep is my own personal fun and i gladly add my signature unless i forget or something. i hope not. someone musta meant tirk's rule just to piss you off and hide. either way, sounds fun.
telling somebody you didnt deserve red is like telling them what their favorite food is. its purely what *they* like or dislike. even if they happen to disapprove of fantastic information and points. we need to be honorable like a losing iron chef. if the judges dont choose your food and you lose to morimotoo, you dont complain, you bow and appreciate that they took the time to appraise your products. you odnt whine and claim you need a chance to get a retort in or a reason they didnt like your food as much. they give the feedback and you say domo arigato.
