You can't compare games like that, it doesn't work and brings us back to that theory that says podunk U should have been the national champs in 2003. Anyway, if LSU would have beat UGA I'd guess you would have thought LSU was mucgh better than Miami, why can't UGA be considered better than Miami for winning the SEC? The one thing I do agree with you on was that the team was not ready to play vs UGA and the coaches have to take responsibility for that, but it wasn';t just at QB. Pretty much the entire team stunk. The players have to shoulder a lot of the blame as well, it is a team game and I don't anybody on the roster would place the blame on just the coaches. Just like there was enough credit to go around after the U game.
Yes while technically true, one could also say that about anything....I'm guessing you're a ****ty bettor...
It was two different teams that we played, and two different versions of our team that showed up - and not because of Flynn. We were injured & tired versus Georgia plus they had a great game. We were rested & healthy versus Miami, plus we had a great game & they laid down for us.
A better question would be how would they have done against Texas. Who cares about how they would have done against USC??? Texas won the title, you should be worried about how you would have done against the best. Why does how you would do against 2nd best matter?
Dude, at night, in Tiger Stadium LSU could spot the New England Patriots two touchdowns and still come back and win. Anyone who thinks otherwise is not a true Tiger fan.
The only thing I gamble on is a College Football Bowl Pick'em at my work. I've been playing for 2 years now and the first year I took first place and the second year I came out like 6th, out of 89 people. Maybe I should try betting.:thumb: