How awesome would it be for the Rose Bowl to have to take Utah?! | Page 3 | TigerFan.com

LSUfan · Nov 22, 2004

Ralph_Wiggum said:

Sure it's not fair, but it's possible. It would probably be better for all bowl games to be anchored to a conference when it doesn't have the title game. The Sugar Bowl being tied to the SEC and the Orange the big 12 like in the past would be best for attendance and ratings. If everyone in the big 12 dreams about a trip to Miami in the dead of January it creates ties and traditions which helps attendance.
Click to expand...

That's true. As much as I don't like the Rose Bowl and it's strict conference tie in . . . it is good for the other bowls to have the same relationship with other conferences. I just want both the Pac10 and Big10 to expand and create title games, that to me would better level the poll/rankings playing field.

How do you guys think Utah will travel this bowl season? Will they be able to bring the amount of fans a BCS school can? Early this season I would have said no, but it seems to me a lot fans in Utah will make the trip anywhere this team plays.

SabanFan · Nov 22, 2004

I think the most ridiculous and aggravating thing about this whole system is that Boston College is looking at a BCS bowl. :angryfire