And I'm the predictable one? At least I'm critical of both sides even though I'll admit it's slanted left.
You ignore the fact that as a senator on the intelligence committee she saw all the information. Besides as First Lady don't you think she saw everything Bill did. You ignore the fact that the President of France, Putin, Merkel and even Saddam's generals thought Iraq had WMDs. France and Russia and possibly Gremany sold him the tools to build biological & chemical WMDs. It wasn't a lie fabricated by a smal cabal in W's White House but was generally believe by intelligence agencies all over the world.
The politics are making wild assumptions in the absence of facts trying to avoid having to run against her. Let the investigations play out.It's really obvious that the Republicans don;t think they can beat her in 2016. So the mudslinging continues.
You mean the mudslinging by the Washington Post, NYT, Yahoo etc, etc, etc???? You mean the mudslinging created by a Federal judge? How about the mudslinging created by the FBI and IGs of State & Intelligence?
The difference is obvious. There are allegations about HRC but there was evidence and testimony to convict the soldiers. What evidence? They are still looking for evidence!
What about the investigations? Were did the Rs start them? Did the Rs decide she should use a private server then lie repeatedly about the reason and what she had done with it and the emails? Didn't HRC have a little to do with creating the mess she's in? You like to frame this as strictly political but it's not. You lose any credibility you may have trying to paint it as such.
What about them? The NYT misreported that there was a criminal investigation or Hillary and had to retract it. But here you are still suggesting that the IG's were investigating HRC. Has a federal judge charged her with anything? Next you will be quoting McClatchy and their retinue of anonymous sources. The media are whores for a story and they gleefully report everything they hear apparently without checking on all the facts. They are doing the same with Trump and will rain on the Republican parade whenever the next gaffe happens.
Sure. But that wasn't what I was commenting on. You are talking like investigation into State Department security is an indictment of Hillary and it ain't! Innocent until proven guilty is the American way, but it damn sure ain't the political way. Trying to pump up your own red, eh? Nice try but no cigar. It's not strictly political, but the political spin is so obvious that even BengalB can see it. Don't pretend to be dumb.
It was also generally believed by intelligence agencies including ours that there was no evidence of WMD's. The neocons cherrypicked the parts they liked and ignored the rest. Did France, Russia, and Germany or NATO go to war with us? Even Britain didn't. The fact is that the WMD's were imaginary and Bush took us to war over them.
