Hillary's E-Mail (Breaking News: Smoking Gun Officially Announced)

Discussion in 'Free Speech Alley' started by Tiger in NC, Mar 12, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    How do you expect people to take you seriously?

    Not to logical people. The law applies equally. Both served as Secretary of State. Both used private email in office. Hillary turned hers over to State. Powell got rid of his.
     
  2. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,753
    Likes Received:
    23,931
    I don't recall asking then to
    How long ago was this? Are the demo or the Hillary camp just now raising a stink over this? If so that really smells like sour grapes.

    As for Powell, there is no possible way you could convince me that he traded, sold or gave away any classified info. If he used an unprotected or unauthorized means of communication he should have been punished in some forms but not if it was that long ago.
     
  3. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Good thing.

    Nobody is raising a stink about him! They are just pointing out the political hypocrisy of this witch hunt of Hillary.

    No one has accused Hillary of this either! And she turned over her emails, unlike Powell. They are making a mountain out of what seems to be a molehill when a Republican does it.

    Well, Hillary has also been out of office for a long time. When did this come up? When she decided to run for President. What a shock. Political witch hunt.

    She has not "traded, sold or gave away any classified info". But they are trying to make it sound like she did, with no evidence whatsoever, just because she used private email. With no crime or scandal to dig up on her, they are resorting to ridiculous stunts just to keep painting her in as bad a light as they can. Eight Benghazi investigations have cleared her of any wrongdoing and they still make accusations for political reasons.
     
  4. uscvball

    uscvball Founding Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2006
    Messages:
    10,673
    Likes Received:
    7,156
    No double standard in place. Hillary IS running for President and as such, yesterday, she claimed that she was never under subpoena and therefore, not required to provide her emails. Colin Powell did not and is not running for President and was never under subpoena for his emails and never went on TV to claim anything other than the truth.

    Hillary said yesterday she was never under subpoena. She was. Another "poor choice of words" or another example of her blatant lying? Let's keep Colin Powell out of it. This has nothing to do with him.
     
  5. shane0911

    shane0911 Helping lost idiots find their village

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    37,753
    Likes Received:
    23,931
    We don't know that yet, we do know that she did include the Rosenthal or Blumentahl whatever the hell his name is "the Clintons dear friend" in stuff that he had no business being in on. He doesn't have a clearance much less one that would give him access to that type of stuff. She is careless, she is dangerous, and she is one of the biggest public liars I have ever seen. I don't know if she gave away secrets, wouldn't put it past her since Billy boy sold the chinese all sorts of good stuff back in his heyday, seems par for the course but she was up to no good, she knows it, most of the country knows it. Only person that doesn't is you because you are waiting for the smoking gun. She is smart enough to pour water on it but she can't change what people think about her.

    I hope the republicans railroad the shit out of her and I don't care if the dems win the office, as long as it isn't her.
     
  6. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    "Never" was inaccurate. She was not under subpoena when she turned over the emails to State. But she got one later.

    That's not what she said. She turned over 55,000 pages of emails without being subpoenaed for them. The subpoena that Gowdy sent was in March, 2015 long after the emails had been released the previous December. One wonders what he expected to accomplish by subpoenaing emails already delivered.

    Of course. She didn't make the time line clear. She was not under subpoena at the time she complied with the request the Benghazi committee has issued to her.

    You can't make it go away. If what did she did was illegal, then Powell is also in trouble. But neither have broken any laws.
     
  7. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    Exactly.

    It's a lot more than me. And everybody must wait for a smoking gun before making the claims that you're making. Nobody gives a shit about your personal opinion of her, you know.

    Out of the mouths of babes.
     
  8. Tiger Exile

    Tiger Exile Long time lurker

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2013
    Messages:
    1,239
    Likes Received:
    690
    You are now just making shit up. And if Powell did the same thing, go after him as well, but that won't happen because he endorsed your golden boy Obama. After all, they have had seven years to go after him with the DOJ. That doesn't fit your obfuscation and narrative does it?
     
  9. Tiger Exile

    Tiger Exile Long time lurker

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2013
    Messages:
    1,239
    Likes Received:
    690
    From the Wall Street Journal: http://www.wsj.com/articles/house-panel-subpoenas-hillary-clintons-personal-emails-1425510872

    "Meanwhile, the Associated Press reported that Mrs. Clinton used a private computer server registered to her home address in Chappaqua, N.Y., which was unusual for a high-ranking official. The configuration was confirmed by The Wall Street Journal by consulting with computer-security experts.

    Mrs. Clinton’s office didn’t respond Wednesday to a request about the security of her email arrangement. The State Department said earlier this week that it had no indication that Mrs. Clinton sent classified information by email.

    Mrs. Clinton’s email practices have raised questions about the adequacy of her record preservation and about how much of her correspondence as secretary of state could be accessed by open-records requests. Her email records were in her possession, and not the State Department’s, until it obtained 55,000 pages of emails last year from her after requesting such records."

    She was ASKED for them and chose what to send then deleted everything else including her yoga schedule and then wiped the server. Now you are going to say she did everything right and we have no right to question her. The Federal Government says that deleting your browser history can be a crime and used it to convict the Boston Bombers' friend. So trashing your server after holding the job that makes you 4th in line to the Presidency is exempt? I don't give a crap who did it before. If you shoot someone tomorrow robbing a bank, you can't use the excuse that "lots of other people have done it!" Or maybe you can if you are a Democrat.
    http://article.wn.com/view/2015/06/08/Deleting_your_browser_history_could_land_you_in_court/
     
  10. red55

    red55 curmudgeon Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2002
    Messages:
    45,195
    Likes Received:
    8,736
    What did I make up?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page