Actually AP published today (I saw in a CNN news scroll) that the FBI has just interviewed Huma Abidin and other top level HRC aides. It is also reported they will call HRC in soon to interview. NC they don't do that if there is only smoke and the interviewee isn't seriously being considered for indictment.
Keep watching the kindling at her feet is smoking.

I hope your correct but absolutely nothing that has occurred in the past would lead me to any conclusion other than she gets off scott free or someone takes the fall for her.

Right, one of the people below her will go to jail, but not her. She will claim ignorance, which is still illegal, and the lib's will suck her dick far into 2020.

Your definition of "anything" is quite special.

"The investigation is still ongoing, but so far investigators haven't found evidence to prove that Clinton willfully violated the law the U.S. officials say."

Note the bold. Then go back to the negligence section I schooled you on.

I saw that. Very obviously part of the process. I am sure soon enough they will interview her and it will be big news. I am anxious to see everyone's reaction here when they do not ask for an indictment.

I can't wait for yours when they do! I'm sure you'll say innocent till convicted in a court of law or some such.

You are a legend in your own mind, Pride. But I forgot that you are a self-proclaimed scholar. I have said all along that the law is clear that she would have had to willfully and maliciously shared confidential information with our enemies for them to ask for an indictment and she has done nothing of the sort. Anyone will agree that what she did was borderline but it doesn't rise to the level of treason as you seem to think.

Except it is. As the law reads she would have to have intentionally shared confidential information with our enemies and she didn't do that. Pride thinks he knows more than he does.....